From: Bernard Pope [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I should have mentioned this paper:
@article{Tremblay01,
author= {G. Tremblay},
title={Lenient evaluation is neither strict nor lazy},
journal= {Computer Languages},
volume= {26},
number= {1},
On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 09:03 +0100, Bayley, Alistair wrote:
From: Bernard Pope [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I should have mentioned this paper:
@article{Tremblay01,
author= {G. Tremblay},
title={Lenient evaluation is neither strict nor lazy},
journal=
From: Jerzy Karczmarczuk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bernard Pope wrote:
I'll be a little bit pedantic here. Haskell, the language definition,
does not prescribe lazy evaluation. It says that the language is
non-strict. Lazy evaluation is an implementation technique which
satisfies
On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 15:19 +0100, Bayley, Alistair wrote:
From: Jerzy Karczmarczuk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bernard Pope wrote:
I'll be a little bit pedantic here. Haskell, the language definition,
does not prescribe lazy evaluation. It says that the language is
non-strict. Lazy