RE: [Haskell-cafe] Strict and non-strict vs eager and lazy, was C onfused about Cyclic struture

2005-07-19 Thread Bayley, Alistair
From: Bernard Pope [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I should have mentioned this paper: @article{Tremblay01, author= {G. Tremblay}, title={Lenient evaluation is neither strict nor lazy}, journal= {Computer Languages}, volume= {26}, number= {1},

RE: [Haskell-cafe] Strict and non-strict vs eager and lazy, was C onfused about Cyclic struture

2005-07-19 Thread Bernard Pope
On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 09:03 +0100, Bayley, Alistair wrote: From: Bernard Pope [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I should have mentioned this paper: @article{Tremblay01, author= {G. Tremblay}, title={Lenient evaluation is neither strict nor lazy}, journal=

RE: [Haskell-cafe] Strict and non-strict vs eager and lazy, was C onfused about Cyclic struture

2005-07-18 Thread Bayley, Alistair
From: Jerzy Karczmarczuk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bernard Pope wrote: I'll be a little bit pedantic here. Haskell, the language definition, does not prescribe lazy evaluation. It says that the language is non-strict. Lazy evaluation is an implementation technique which satisfies

RE: [Haskell-cafe] Strict and non-strict vs eager and lazy, was C onfused about Cyclic struture

2005-07-18 Thread Bernard Pope
On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 15:19 +0100, Bayley, Alistair wrote: From: Jerzy Karczmarczuk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bernard Pope wrote: I'll be a little bit pedantic here. Haskell, the language definition, does not prescribe lazy evaluation. It says that the language is non-strict. Lazy