On 10/29/07, Bulat Ziganshin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you may also look at these data:
1,225,416 bytes allocated in the heap
152,984 bytes copied during GC (scavenged)
8,448 bytes copied during GC (not scavenged)
86,808 bytes maximum residency (1 sample(s))
3
Hello Josef,
Monday, October 29, 2007, 2:08:54 PM, you wrote:
that can maybe account for the additional time savings. I'm not sure
how to verify that this is the case though.
Bulat kindly suggested I use +RTS -s to monitor the garbage collectors
behavior. It seems my hypothesis was right.
