On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 03:36:12 -0600, Luke Palmer lrpal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:04 PM, Dean Herington
heringtonla...@mindspring.com wrote:
With respect to datatype destructing functions, the Prelude has:
maybe :: b - (a - b) - Maybe a - b
either :: (a - c) - (b - c) -
At 3:36 AM -0600 10/5/10, Luke Palmer wrote:
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:04 PM, Dean Herington
heringtonla...@mindspring.com wrote:
With respect to datatype destructing functions, the Prelude has:
maybe :: b - (a - b) - Maybe a - b
either :: (a - c) - (b - c) - Either a b - c
which suggests
Hello Ketil,
Monday, October 4, 2010, 11:30:48 AM, you wrote:
Prelude (if then Haskell else Cafe) False
lambda-if is easily implemented in terms of usual functions.
and we even have one named bool:
bool: Bool - a - a - a
lambda-case cannot be implemented as a function since we need
matching
On 4 October 2010 10:55, Bulat Ziganshin bulat.zigans...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Ketil,
Monday, October 4, 2010, 11:30:48 AM, you wrote:
Prelude (if then Haskell else Cafe) False
lambda-if is easily implemented in terms of usual functions.
and we even have one named bool:
bool: Bool - a -
At 12:05 PM +0200 10/4/10, Christopher Done wrote:
On 4 October 2010 10:55, Bulat Ziganshin bulat.zigans...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Ketil,
Monday, October 4, 2010, 11:30:48 AM, you wrote:
Prelude (if then Haskell else Cafe) False
lambda-if is easily implemented in terms of usual
