Hello Jeff,
Thursday, May 28, 2009, 2:03:30 AM, you wrote:
I absolutely agree about expected/inferred. I always forget which is
which, because I can figure both could apply to each.
thank you, it's what i meant! compiler infers types of both caller and
its argument and then expect to see
Hello Max,
Thursday, May 28, 2009, 2:14:19 AM, you wrote:
I absolutely agree about expected/inferred. I always forget which is
which, because I can figure both could apply to each.
That's actually true for me too. When you say it like that, I remember
times when I've had the same confusion.
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Bulat Ziganshin
bulat.zigans...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Max,
Thursday, May 28, 2009, 2:14:19 AM, you wrote:
I absolutely agree about expected/inferred. I always forget which is
which, because I can figure both could apply to each.
That's actually true for me
I like the expected/inferred vocabulary. Maybe it comes from being a
native English speaker, but to me, it says this is what we expected
to get, but instead (through type inference), we got this type for
this term.
As another native English speaker, I found expected/inferred very
intuitive
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 23:59 -0400, John Dorsey wrote:
There was one hang-up; it wasn't at all clear which referred to the term,
and which referred to the context. (Really both types are inferred.) This
stopped bothering me when I decided it didn't matter which was which, and I
could
