Hello,
I've been sitting on this for a while, waiting for some changes to uvector to
go in, but finally decided I should just release it, and fix it up if and when
said changes go in. So, I'm announcing the first release of uvector-
algorithms.
What it is is a library of algorithms (mostly
Adam Vogt wrote:
* On Saturday, December 13 2008, Gianfranco Alongi wrote:
I have actually been thinking about a similar thing, but on the group
subject.
One can actually group things in many ways, such as groupBy (==) , so
that groupBy (==) [1,2,1,2] should give
[[1,1],[2,2]]. Of course
The Haskell syntax script for vim mentions this mailing list as the
maintainer. Perhaps one of you could fix this bug.
Comments on the same line as import declarations don't get highlighted:
I don't know how this list-as-maintainer idea is going to work,
but the fix seems straightforward: find
I noticed a new haskell logo idea on a tshirt today,
http://image.spreadshirt.net/image-server/image/configuration/13215127/producttypecolor/2/type/png
Simple, clean and *pure*.
Instead of the we got lots going on of the current logo.
Any graphic designers want to try some variations on
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Don Stewart d...@galois.com wrote:
I noticed a new haskell logo idea on a tshirt today,
http://image.spreadshirt.net/image-server/image/configuration/13215127/producttypecolor/2/type/png
Simple, clean and *pure*.
I like it. I prefer the thick lambda
?
attachment: cover.jpg
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
http://i35.tinypic.com/mjon83.png
used this: http://www.simwebsol.com/ImageTool/Default.aspx
2008/12/14 George Pollard por...@porg.es:
?
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Don Stewart d...@galois.com wrote:
I noticed a new haskell logo idea on a tshirt today,
http://image.spreadshirt.net/image-server/image/configuration/13215127/producttypecolor/2/type/png
I'd buy one, but I'm not seeing it on spreadshirt.net.
brianchina60221:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Don Stewart d...@galois.com wrote:
I noticed a new haskell logo idea on a tshirt today,
http://image.spreadshirt.net/image-server/image/configuration/13215127/producttypecolor/2/type/png
I'd buy one, but I'm not seeing it on
Don Stewart d...@galois.com writes:
I noticed a new haskell logo idea on a tshirt today,
http://image.spreadshirt.net/image-server/image/configuration/13215127/producttypecolor/2/type/png
Simple, clean and *pure*.
Nice. For some more hubris, replace 'A' with 'The'.
-k
--
If I
ketil:
Don Stewart d...@galois.com writes:
I noticed a new haskell logo idea on a tshirt today,
http://image.spreadshirt.net/image-server/image/configuration/13215127/producttypecolor/2/type/png
Simple, clean and *pure*.
Nice. For some more hubris, replace 'A' with 'The'.
On 2008 Dec 14, at 16:50, sam lee wrote:
http://i35.tinypic.com/mjon83.png
used this: http://www.simwebsol.com/ImageTool/Default.aspx
Win from the visually interesting angle, but massive lose from the
legibility angle.
--
brandon s. allbery [solaris,freebsd,perl,pugs,haskell]
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 2:38 PM, Don Stewart d...@galois.com wrote:
ketil:
Nice. For some more hubris, replace 'A' with 'The'.
I had the very same thought :)
It certainly wouldn't do to let, say, the existence of Concurrent
Clean get in the way of our self-promotion.
/g
--
I am in here
The typehash library allows you to produce a unique identifier (a
cryptographic hash) for a type.
This is useful if you save values of some type to a file (text,
binary, whatever format you wish)
and then when you read it back in again you want to verify that the
type you want to read is the
one
On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 23:15 +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Hi,
Am Montag, den 08.12.2008, 15:59 -0600 schrieb Nathan Bloomfield:
Slightly off topic, but the A^B notation for hom-sets also makes the
natural isomorphism we call currying expressable as A^(BxC) = (A^B)^C.
So A^(B+C) = A^B
On 15 Dec 2008, at 12:52 pm, Derek Elkins wrote:
I want to point out a quick categorical way of proving this (and
almost
all the other arithmetic laws follow similarly.) This is just
continuity of right adjoints. The interesting thing is the
adjunction,
one that is commonly neglected in
On 14 dec 2008, at 22:15, Don Stewart wrote:
I noticed a new haskell logo idea on a tshirt today,
http://image.spreadshirt.net/image-server/image/configuration/13215127/producttypecolor/2/type/png
Simple, clean and *pure*.
Instead of the we got lots going on of the current logo.
Any
eelco:
On 14 dec 2008, at 22:15, Don Stewart wrote:
I noticed a new haskell logo idea on a tshirt today,
http://image.spreadshirt.net/image-server/image/configuration/13215127/producttypecolor/2/type/png
Simple, clean and *pure*.
Instead of the we got lots going on of the current
On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 02:57 +0100, Eelco Lempsink wrote:
On 14 dec 2008, at 22:15, Don Stewart wrote:
I noticed a new haskell logo idea on a tshirt today,
http://image.spreadshirt.net/image-server/image/configuration/13215127/producttypecolor/2/type/png
Simple, clean and *pure*.
I like the proposed logo even more now that you've pointed out the
similarity. :-)
-Corey O'Connor
2008/12/14 George Pollard por...@porg.es:
?
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
Jeff Heard jefferson.r.heard at gmail.com writes:
I had luck building the latest GHC from source using the ghc 6.6
binary build to bootstrap. The 6.8+ binary builds run into a timer
issue, at least on 64 bit CentOS that causes them to bork out during
the configure script.
2008/12/12
I have, for a change, a relatively simple problem with type classes. Can
somebody explain to me, or point me to an explanation of the behaviour I see?
Here is a short and useless example:
{-# LANGUAGE MultiParamTypeClasses, FlexibleInstances #-}
import Data.Maybe
class Container x y
I'll take a swing at this one:
instance Container (Maybe x) [x] where
wrapper = isNothing
. . .
That isn't a sensible definition of 'wrapper', but I believe without
trying to compile it is completely legal. Which wrapper do you use?
You /don't/ have a different matching Container
I'll take a swing at this one:
instance Container (Maybe x) [x] where
wrapper = isNothing
. . .
That isn't a sensible definition of 'wrapper', but I believe without
trying to compile it is completely legal. Which wrapper do you use?
You /don't/ have a different matching Container
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 8:10 PM, Mario Blažević mblaze...@stilo.com wrote:
I'll take a swing at this one:
instance Container (Maybe x) [x] where
wrapper = isNothing
. . .
That isn't a sensible definition of 'wrapper', but I believe without
trying to compile it is completely legal. Which
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008, Mario Bla?evi? wrote:
I'll take a swing at this one:
instance Container (Maybe x) [x] where
wrapper = isNothing
. . .
That isn't a sensible definition of 'wrapper', but I believe without
trying to compile it is completely legal. Which wrapper do you use?
You /don't/
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Don Stewart d...@galois.com wrote:
Could you attach it to the web page,
http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Haskell_logos/New_logo_ideas
I tossed up a quickie candidate there as well.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
J. Garrett Morris jgmor...@cecs.pdx.edu writes:
Nice. For some more hubris, replace 'A' with 'The'.
I had the very same thought :)
It certainly wouldn't do to let, say, the existence of Concurrent
Clean get in the way of our self-promotion.
Well, they get to make T-shirts with Clean - the
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 6:54 AM, David Menendez d...@zednenem.com wrote:
2008/12/13 Nathan Bloomfield nblo...@gmail.com:
I want to be able to parse a string of digits to a type level numeral as
described in the Number parameterized types paper. After fiddling with the
problem for a while, I'm
29 matches
Mail list logo
