How are you gentlemen.
I'm interested about what additions to DPH would really benefit
the community.
The only ticket on DPH in GSoC Trac seems a bit stale:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/summer-of-code/ticket/1537.
Any new tips?
My field is currently molecular simulation. (I'm doing a Direct
22.03.2012, 03:24, Geoffrey Mainland mainl...@apeiron.net:
Taking advantage of GHC's SIMD support from within DPH is in the works.
I'd love to have some good target applications to help drive the work.
An application with DPH, plain C, C+SSE intrinsics, and, say, OpenCL
versions would be even
21.03.2012, 18:12, Ryan Newton rrnew...@gmail.com:
The big topic would seem to be using Geoff Mainland's new simd-ghc support.
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/SIMD
Geoff, is that already under way or is it too big a project for a GSOC?
Dmitry, do you already have GHC-internals
06.04.2012, 18:02, Dominic Steinitz idontgetoutm...@googlemail.com:
cabal: cannot configure repa-2.2.0.1. It requires base ==4.4.*
Tests-MacBook-Pro:PDE Test$ ghc --version
The Glorious Glasgow Haskell Compilation System, version 7.0.3
I think this might be because base-4.3 was shipped with
Hello everyone.
I wonder why using do notation with `-` can ruin the performance.
In essence the problem is that, for some action `f :: m Double`,
running the code (in my case, `standard` from mwc-random).
f
for million times is fast but the code
do
v - f
return v
is
11.06.2012, 14:17, Malcolm Wallace malcolm.wall...@me.com:
that there are no side-effects
There are — PRNG state is updated for RealWorld, that's why monadic replicateM
is used.
You can add something like
print $ (VU.!) e 50
after e is bound and still get 0.057 sec with do-less
12.06.2012, 01:08, Roman Leshchinskiy r...@cse.unsw.edu.au:
perhaps the state hack is getting in the way.
I don't quite understand the internals of this yet, but `-fno-state-hack` leads
to great performance in both cases!
How safe is that?
___
01.12.2012, 15:14, Fixie Fixie fixie.fi...@rocketmail.com:
Hello haskellers
I am struggling with this package: Data.Vector.Storable.Mutable
I am creating vectors like this: MV.new 1000 :: IO (V.MVector (PrimState IO)
Int)
Now I would like access to this vectors in linear time, like I could
28.03.2013, 10:38, Myles C. Maxfield myles.maxfi...@gmail.com:
Hello all. I'm using the Data.Vector.generate function with a complicated
creation function to create a long vector. Is it possible to parallelize the
creation of each element?
Alternatively, if there was something like parMap
