On 28 aug 2009, at 08:11, Jason Dusek wrote:
2009/08/27 Bulat Ziganshin bulat.zigans...@gmail.com:
...stop reusing Prelude operators, in particular, replace -
with $?
I have to say, the `$ do` construct is an eyesore and `- do` is a
lot easier on the eyes.
Would it introduce ambiguity in
On Aug 30, 2009, at 14:56 , S.Doaitse Swierstra wrote:
On 28 aug 2009, at 08:11, Jason Dusek wrote:
2009/08/27 Bulat Ziganshin bulat.zigans...@gmail.com:
...stop reusing Prelude operators, in particular, replace -
with $?
I have to say, the `$ do` construct is an eyesore and `- do` is a
lot
Say we have a nice thread on this and we all realize that the
precedence of `do` and `case` could be changed (and changing
`if` would be nice but we can't have everything). How many
months/years would it take for any change in that direction to
occur?
--
Jason Dusek
Jason Dusek wrote:
Say we have a nice thread on this and we all realize that the
precedence of `do` and `case` could be changed (and changing
`if` would be nice but we can't have everything). How many
months/years would it take for any change in that direction to
occur?
Seven!
2009/08/27 Bulat Ziganshin bulat.zigans...@gmail.com:
...stop reusing Prelude operators, in particular, replace -
with $?
I have to say, the `$ do` construct is an eyesore and `- do` is a
lot easier on the eyes.
Would it introduce ambiguity in the Haskell grammar if
foo do...
Hello Jinjing,
Friday, August 28, 2009, 9:08:58 AM, you wrote:
hand written html is fine, except for the closing tags:
may be it's possible to omit them using type machinery?
link [rel icon, _type image/png, href panda_icon.png] (/)
it contains unpredictable mix of xxx', _xxx and
