Re: [Haskell-cafe] ghc in macports

2010-08-12 Thread Benedict Eastaugh
On 11 August 2010 15:49, Ozgur Akgun ozgurak...@gmail.com wrote:

 Personally, I'd like to use the macports version, if the ghc version there
 was resonably recent (having 2 versions, a stable and an edge could be a
 good idea?)

You could use Homebrew instead. That has a fairly up-to-date version
of GHC and the Haskell Platform.

http://mxcl.github.com/homebrew/
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] ghc in macports

2010-08-12 Thread Ozgur Akgun
sounds good to me. where can I find the list of packages (or whatever they
call them in homebrew, formula?) available?

On 12 August 2010 11:49, Benedict Eastaugh ionf...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 11 August 2010 15:49, Ozgur Akgun ozgurak...@gmail.com wrote:

  Personally, I'd like to use the macports version, if the ghc version
 there
  was resonably recent (having 2 versions, a stable and an edge could be a
  good idea?)

 You could use Homebrew instead. That has a fairly up-to-date version
 of GHC and the Haskell Platform.

 http://mxcl.github.com/homebrew/




-- 
Ozgur Akgun
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] ghc in macports

2010-08-12 Thread Hans Aberg


On 12 Aug 2010, at 12:49, Benedict Eastaugh wrote:


On 11 August 2010 15:49, Ozgur Akgun ozgurak...@gmail.com wrote:

Personally, I'd like to use the macports version, if the ghc  
version there
was resonably recent (having 2 versions, a stable and an edge could  
be a

good idea?)


You could use Homebrew instead. That has a fairly up-to-date version
of GHC and the Haskell Platform.

http://mxcl.github.com/homebrew/


On
  http://wiki.github.com/mxcl/homebrew/installation
it says:
  delete /usr/local/include and/usr/local/lib
So its not for those that also installs standard distributions, it  
seems.


But what's wrong with the binaries listed here:
  http://haskell.org/ghc/
Fairly easy to install.

___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] ghc in macports

2010-08-12 Thread Max Bolingbroke
On 12 August 2010 12:17, Ozgur Akgun ozgurak...@gmail.com wrote:
 sounds good to me. where can I find the list of packages (or whatever they
 call them in homebrew, formula?) available?

Homebrew only makes available GHC and the Platform:

http://github.com/mxcl/homebrew/blob/master/Library/Formula/ghc.rb
http://github.com/mxcl/homebrew/blob/master/Library/Formula/haskell-platform.rb

AFAIK Homebrew's policy is to not provide packages for things that can
be installed via language-specific package management tools.
Consequently, they don't provide packages for Ruby gems (use gem
instead), Python eggs (use easy_install) and Haskell packages (use
cabal).

Cheers,
Max
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] ghc in macports

2010-08-12 Thread Ozgur Akgun
On 12 August 2010 12:52, Hans Aberg haber...@telia.com wrote:

 On
  http://wiki.github.com/mxcl/homebrew/installation
 it says:
  delete /usr/local/include and/usr/local/lib
 So its not for those that also installs standard distributions, it seems.


I thought this was just a recommendation.

-- 
Ozgur Akgun
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] ghc in macports

2010-08-12 Thread Hans Aberg

On 12 Aug 2010, at 14:08, Ozgur Akgun wrote:


On
 http://wiki.github.com/mxcl/homebrew/installation
it says:
 delete /usr/local/include and/usr/local/lib
So its not for those that also installs standard distributions, it  
seems.


I thought this was just a recommendation.


It also says:
  We’ve had a *lot* of bug reports that are first inexplicable and  
later it turns out that it’s because the user has some of their own  
libs and headers in/usr/local.



___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] ghc in macports

2010-08-12 Thread Gaius Hammond


On 12 Aug 2010, at 12:52, Hans Aberg wrote:

 its not for those that also installs standard distributions, it  
seems.


But what's wrong with the binaries listed here:
 http://haskell.org/ghc/
Fairly easy to install.




Yes and no; on OSX 10.5.8 it works better to install GHC from the  
binary then build Platform yourself. On 10.6 it seems to be OK.




Cheers,



G




___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] ghc in macports

2010-08-12 Thread Hans Aberg

On 12 Aug 2010, at 20:46, Gaius Hammond wrote:

its not for those that also installs standard distributions, it  
seems.


But what's wrong with the binaries listed here:
http://haskell.org/ghc/
Fairly easy to install.


Yes and no; on OSX 10.5.8 it works better to install GHC from the  
binary then build Platform yourself. On 10.6 it seems to be OK.


OK. I was only thinking on the compiler (as in the first post). When  
adding packages, it is trickier; I've only by hand. Then in some case  
MacPorts might be better if wanting to do a lot of package chasing -  
perhaps it was Gtk.


___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] ghc in macports

2010-08-11 Thread Lyndon Maydwell
Seconded.

I've started using the Haskell Platform mainly because the ports
version is out of date.

Unfortunately it keeps getting pulled in as a dependency of something
even though I'm not using it.

On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Ozgur Akgun ozgurak...@gmail.com wrote:
 Dear Cafe,

 I wonder who is maintaining the ghc package in macports, and what the
 current stategy of doing things is?
 http://www.macports.org/ports.php?by=namesubstr=ghc (ghc 6.10.4)

 Personally, I'd like to use the macports version, if the ghc version there
 was resonably recent (having 2 versions, a stable and an edge could be a
 good idea?)

 Thanks,
 Ozgur


 ___
 Haskell-Cafe mailing list
 Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
 http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe