Hi all,
I've uploaded the 2009.2.1 release candidate installer to
http://code.haskell.org/~refold/HaskellPlatform-2009.2.1-rc1-setup.exe
Unless someone finds serious bugs in this RC, it can be released unchanged.
What's new in 2009.2.1-rc1:
* The platform installer is now relocatable (all
#29: Create "Haskell Platform" rather than "GHC" menu entry
+---
Reporter: jgbai...@gmail.com |Owner: refold
Type: enhancement | Status: assigned
Priority: major |Milestone
#36: Installer actions should be better documented.
---+
Reporter: refold |Owner: refold
Type: enhancement| Status: assigned
Priority: major |Milestone: 2009.2.2
#28: Always create uninstaller
+---
Reporter: jgbai...@gmail.com |Owner: refold
Type: enhancement | Status: assigned
Priority: minor |Milestone: 2009.2.2
Component: Windo
#30: Create library documentation by default
+---
Reporter: jgbai...@gmail.com |Owner: refold
Type: enhancement | Status: assigned
Priority: minor |Milestone: 2009.2.2
Com
#24: GHC in a directory with spaces causes configure failure
---+
Reporter: larsv |Owner: refold
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: minor |Milestone:
#19: The platform directory should be relocatable
---+
Reporter: refold |Owner: refold
Type: enhancement| Status: closed
Priority: minor |Milestone: 2009.2.1
C
#19: The platform directory should be relocatable
---+
Reporter: refold |Owner: refold
Type: enhancement| Status: closed
Priority: minor |Milestone: 2009.2.1
C
Hi Duncan,
2009/5/31 Duncan Coutts :
> So, I'm more or less convinced that we should just ship time-1.1.2.4.
> For those installers where we include ghc (ie windows atm) I see no
> reason not to remove any existing lib. For the users of the generic
> tarball they'd end up with two versions but tha
On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 11:07 +0100, Duncan Coutts wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 05:48 +0200, Mikhail Glushenkov wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > ghc-6.10.3 ships with time-1.1.3, but we list time-1.1.2.4 in
> > haskell-platform.cabal. Shouldn't this library be upgraded?
>
> Aarg. Again, they've managed
On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 14:19 +0400, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
> Hello Duncan,
>
> Sunday, May 31, 2009, 2:07:36 PM, you wrote:
>
> >> ghc-6.10.3 ships with time-1.1.3, but we list time-1.1.2.4 in
> >> haskell-platform.cabal. Shouldn't this library be upgraded?
>
> > Perhaps we should replace it with
On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 04:55 +, Mikhail Glushenkov wrote:
> Mikhail Glushenkov writes:
>
> > Judging by the comments in ticket #44, the main
> > reason for it was API compatibility, but looking at GHC 6.10.2 docs, I
> > don't see System.Console.Editline appearing anywhere.
>
> This is true on
Hello Duncan,
Sunday, May 31, 2009, 2:07:36 PM, you wrote:
>> ghc-6.10.3 ships with time-1.1.3, but we list time-1.1.2.4 in
>> haskell-platform.cabal. Shouldn't this library be upgraded?
> Perhaps we should replace it with a released version. I don't see how we
> can preserve the API otherwise.
On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 05:48 +0200, Mikhail Glushenkov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> ghc-6.10.3 ships with time-1.1.3, but we list time-1.1.2.4 in
> haskell-platform.cabal. Shouldn't this library be upgraded?
Aarg. Again, they've managed to release ghc with a library that is not
in a release state. There i
14 matches
Mail list logo
