Excerpts from Michael Snoyman's message of Fri Dec 07 00:29:14 -0800 2012:
> Let me give a more extreme example: suppose that the bug in text hadn't
> simply been slower compile times, but instead it segfaulted every time you
> appended two empty strings. What would be our response to users? Should
> Now this problem may be completely resolved in newer versions of
> cabal-install, but I think having a large number of packages in the global
> package database pegged at specific versions is a very strong recipe for
> reintroducing version hell. Coming back to yaml: it depends on conduit.
> Supp
+1
Cheers,
Edward
Excerpts from Johan Tibell's message of Wed Aug 29 21:33:44 -0400 2012:
> Hi all,
>
> After reading the Safe Haskell paper today, I got the impression that
> no one actually wants the .Safe modules currently in vector. If vector
> was to be made Safe Haskell friendly, we should
