Re: Haskell-Platform Committee Action!

2010-12-20 Thread Isaac Dupree
On 12/18/10 19:36, Duncan Coutts wrote: > On 17 December 2010 08:07, Isaac Dupree > wrote: >> (I wonder if we can make it easy for the libraries list to remember that >> we're being authorityless. We could have a standard signature, something > > Hmm. Since people do forget, e.g. SPJ asking for

Re: Haskell-Platform Committee Action!

2010-12-18 Thread Duncan Coutts
On 17 December 2010 08:07, Isaac Dupree wrote: > You're right.  So, let's see if I'm clear what an HP proposal is > specifically: To add a package, or to remove a package.  But not to upgrade > a package or change a package (except where it adds new dependencies that > are not in the Platform).

Re: Haskell-Platform Committee Action!

2010-12-17 Thread Isaac Dupree
On 12/15/10 06:23, Duncan Coutts wrote: > On 15 December 2010 06:36, Isaac Dupree > wrote: >> I need to ask y'all: are library patch proposals (like "Proposal: Add chop >> function to Data.List") part of our mission? Mostly all the libraries >> maintained by librar...@haskell.org are part of the

Re: Haskell-Platform Committee Action!

2010-12-15 Thread Duncan Coutts
On 15 December 2010 06:36, Isaac Dupree wrote: > I need to ask y'all: are library patch proposals (like "Proposal: Add chop > function to Data.List") part of our mission?  Mostly all the libraries > maintained by librar...@haskell.org are part of the Haskell Platform now > (though not vice versa)

Haskell-Platform Committee Action!

2010-12-14 Thread Isaac Dupree
I need to ask y'all: are library patch proposals (like "Proposal: Add chop function to Data.List") part of our mission? Mostly all the libraries maintained by librar...@haskell.org are part of the Haskell Platform now (though not vice versa), so I imagine so. There are about six active library