Re: Haskell ecosystem improvements meta-propsal

2016-02-19 Thread Mike Meyer
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 1:45 AM Mark Lentczner wrote: > On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 7:24 PM, Mike Meyer wrote: > >> I've dealt with the IETF RFC process and the Python PEP process, and both >> of them worked better than that. > > > While both those are good examples of mostly working organizations > s

Re: Haskell ecosystem improvements meta-propsal

2016-02-19 Thread Mark Lentczner
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 7:24 PM, Mike Meyer wrote: > I've dealt with the IETF RFC process and the Python PEP process, and both > of them worked better than that. While both those are good examples of mostly working organizations shepherding foundational technical standard(s) along... there is on

Haskell ecosystem improvements meta-propsal

2016-02-19 Thread Mike Meyer
There's been a lot of complaints about the way things have worked in the past, with things going to fast, or to slow, or the right people not being heard, or notices not going to the right places, etc. As far as I can tell, the current process is that someone make a proposal on some mailing list,