Re: Cabal in HP (Was: binary in HP

2013-03-18 Thread shelarcy
OK. I see. On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 01:28:00 +0900, Mark Lentczner wrote: Again, I'm very reluctant to alter the version of a package that comes with GHC. In this case, it would require any packager of HP to be sure to rebuild GHC 7.6.2 with the altered version. That would be change from current p

Re: Cabal in HP (Was: binary in HP

2013-03-17 Thread Mark Lentczner
Again, I'm very reluctant to alter the version of a package that comes with GHC. In this case, it would require any packager of HP to be sure to rebuild GHC 7.6.2 with the altered version. That would be change from current practice for packagers. Further, for some distributions it is not possible b

Cabal in HP (Was: binary in HP

2013-03-16 Thread shelarcy
.2.0.0, will use GHC 7.6.2 as I understand it, therefore the old version of binary. The HP will eventually upgrade to a more recent version of binary when it will use GHC 7.8 or later. My question is whether HP would like to upgrade before that happens. Two approaches could be taken. 1. Add bina

Re: binary in HP

2013-03-11 Thread Lennart Kolmodin
, 2013.2.0.0, will use GHC 7.6.2 as I understand it, >>> therefore the old version of binary. >>> The HP will eventually upgrade to a more recent version of binary when >>> it will use GHC 7.8 or later. >>> My question is whether HP would like to upgrade before tha

Re: binary in HP

2013-03-10 Thread Mikhail Glushenkov
Hi Mark, > The first would create a really bad "cabal-hell" trap (which is really a > version constraint hell, not sure why cabal takes the fall...). I am not so sure about that. It's perfectly possible to have two different versions of a library installed, and the solver usually does the right

Re: binary in HP

2013-03-10 Thread Mark Lentczner
gt;> The HP will eventually upgrade to a more recent version of binary when it >> will use GHC 7.8 or later. >> My question is whether HP would like to upgrade before that happens. >> >> Two approaches could be taken. >> >>1. Add binary-0.7. There will be

Re: binary in HP

2013-03-10 Thread Gregory Collins
grade to a more recent version of binary when it > will use GHC 7.8 or later. > My question is whether HP would like to upgrade before that happens. > > Two approaches could be taken. > >1. Add binary-0.7. There will be two versions of binary in HP. >2. Replace binary-0.5.1

binary in HP

2013-03-10 Thread Lennart Kolmodin
e that happens. Two approaches could be taken. 1. Add binary-0.7. There will be two versions of binary in HP. 2. Replace binary-0.5.1.1 with binary-0.7 in the source of GHC 7.6.2. Requires a little bit of work, but the installers for HP would install only one version of binary. H