RE: Status of Haskell Platform?

2010-05-24 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
| It is not about fiddling with the webpages now, to add todays info - | that will only help for a few weeks. It is about making sure that the | relevant information is maintained in the system, in such a way that it | is published automatically or at least available to be queried. I rather agree

Re: Status of Haskell Platform?

2010-05-24 Thread Don Stewart
This is very interesting. I agree more information is useful to /some/ -- but the vast majority of downloaders don't seem to need it. I don't agree that most people care about the timeline -- it just should be relative easy to find a timeline if you need it. We're modelling ourselves on gnome and

Re: Status of Haskell Platform?

2010-05-24 Thread Isaac Dupree
On 05/24/10 03:27, Don Stewart wrote: > We're modelling ourselves on gnome and ubuntu, which have well > specified timetables for developers > (and I agree we could do better to specify), while hiding that info > from downloaders. If in doubt, look at the HP wiki! > > So how do we balance the curio