RE: haskell platform steering committee...

2010-11-12 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
| > * Yes, if the HP committee doesn't want a geocaching library under any | circumstances, you are free to say "unconditionally no".  Step 1 is fully under the | control of the HP committee.  Step 2 is fully under the control of the author. |  That's the whole idea! | | That's the problem, there

Re: Haskell Platform decision: time to bless parsec 3?

2010-11-12 Thread Nicolas Pouillard
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 08:18:59 -0700, Don Stewart wrote: > Hey all, > > This is a loose end in the package policy situation: when the HP has a > major upgrade, the policy is to do all major upgrades for any packages > contained in the HP, as long as they don't add new dependencies. > > One exceptio

bar

2010-11-12 Thread Ian Lynagh
foo ___ Haskell-platform mailing list Haskell-platform@projects.haskell.org http://projects.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-platform

Re: bar

2010-11-12 Thread Don Stewart
baz ___ Haskell-platform mailing list Haskell-platform@projects.haskell.org http://projects.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-platform

Re: Contribution vs quality, and a few notes on the Platform process

2010-11-12 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:15:46PM +, Duncan Coutts wrote: > On 11 November 2010 16:21, Ian Lynagh wrote: > > Also, is there a better list than haskell-platf...@projects for > > communicating with the steering committee? I don't see any addresses on > > the committee list page: > >    http://t