Hi all,
After reading the Safe Haskell paper today, I got the impression that
no one actually wants the .Safe modules currently in vector. If vector
was to be made Safe Haskell friendly, we should instead add .Unsafe
modules (and have the rest of the modules declared Trustworthy).
Having .Unsafe m
As the Mighty Morphin' Power Rangers say: "Let's do this!"
- Mark
___
Haskell-platform mailing list
Haskell-platform@projects.haskell.org
http://projects.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-platform
+1
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Johan Tibell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After reading the Safe Haskell paper today, I got the impression that
> no one actually wants the .Safe modules currently in vector. If vector
> was to be made Safe Haskell friendly, we should instead add .Unsafe
> modules (and
+1
Cheers,
Edward
Excerpts from Johan Tibell's message of Wed Aug 29 21:33:44 -0400 2012:
> Hi all,
>
> After reading the Safe Haskell paper today, I got the impression that
> no one actually wants the .Safe modules currently in vector. If vector
> was to be made Safe Haskell friendly, we should
> If you are GHC Central: I couldn't find a timeline for 7.6. Will that have
> hit a stable release by October 1st, or should we be planning on shipping
> 7.4.2 (which I think would be fine.)
Was there response/update to this? :)
I know 7.6.1 rc1 has been out for less than 3 weeks and ICFP is com
