On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Mark Lentczner wrote:
> In my Haskell Implementors 2012 talk Haskell Platform: Field Report and
> Future Goals, I called for an expansion of the content of the platform to
> bring it up to par with what other programming language platforms provide.
>
> Please see my
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Edward Z. Yang wrote:
> > Now this problem may be completely resolved in newer versions of
> > cabal-install, but I think having a large number of packages in the
> global
> > package database pegged at specific versions is a very strong recipe for
> > reintroduci
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Edward Z. Yang wrote:
> Excerpts from Michael Snoyman's message of Fri Dec 07 00:29:14 -0800 2012:
> > Let me give a more extreme example: suppose that the bug in text hadn't
> > simply been slower compile times, but instead it segfaulted every time
> you
> > appe
of GHC anywhere on your path.)
>
> On Sunday, July 12, 2015, Michael Snoyman wrote:
>
>> I'm +1 on nailing down an LTS release cycle, I've been pushing for it,
>> and planning that it would happen after the first few releases. I'm fine
>> with doing it s
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 1:15 AM Heinrich Apfelmus
wrote:
> Mark Lentczner wrote:
> > *tl;dr: We'd like to incorporate stack into Haskell Platform, and stop
> > shipping pre-built packages, so we banish cabal hell, and have a single
> > common way to 'get Haskell' that just works.*
> >
> > [..]
>
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 11:16 AM Heinrich Apfelmus <
apfel...@quantentunnel.de> wrote:
> Michael Snoyman wrote:
> >
> >> Hopefully, they come with suitable documentation. For instance, one
> >> thing I don't understand about stack yet is in which locatio
