Hello Ross,
Saturday, March 25, 2006, 4:16:01 AM, you wrote:
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 02:47:09PM -, Simon Marlow wrote:
I think it would be a mistake to relegate concurrency to an addendum; it
is a central feature of the language, and in fact is one area where
Haskell (strictly speaking
At http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/haskell-prime/wiki/CompositionAsDot ,
there is a list of possible Unicode replacements for the '.'
operator. Oddly, the canonical one is missing (from
http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U2200.pdf ):
2218 RING OPERATOR
= composite function
2218 RING OPERATOR
= composite function
= APL jot
00B0 degree sign
25E6 white bullet
I don't think any other Unicode character should be considered.
That's great but
1) I have no idea how to type it. Can I easily and comfortably? In emacs?
On 2006-03-25 at 09:41PST Jared Updike wrote:
2218 RING OPERATOR
= composite function
= APL jot
00B0 degree sign
25E6 white bullet
I don't think any other Unicode character should be considered.
That's great but
1) I have no idea
Gah! I managed to send that without a content-type field
(for bizarre reasons which I won't elaborate right
now). Here it is again with what I hope is the right (utf-8)
type, which ought to make it more legible in some email
readers.
On 2006-03-25 at 09:41PST Jared Updike wrote:
2218 RING
On Sat, 2006-03-25 at 13:17 +0300, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Hello Ross,
Saturday, March 25, 2006, 4:16:01 AM, you wrote:
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 02:47:09PM -, Simon Marlow wrote:
I think it would be a mistake to relegate concurrency to an addendum; it
is a central feature of the
