-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 01/06/16 08:44, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote:
> Well, I'd really like to see the grammar relaxed to allow for redundant
> leading separators so I could finally use my personal ideal
> diff-friendly style:
>
> something = [
> , one
> ,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 08/05/16 05:03, wren romano wrote:
> One of my big concerns here is that the proposal is vague, and
> therefore impossible to judge.
It is intentionally somewhat vague because I would the committee to
address this problem which is largely solved
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 07/05/16 10:44, Jon Fairbairn wrote:
> Something that is missing from this type of discussion is any
> reference to design rules, agreement on which should be made before
> any suggestion like this.
>
> The one this violates is “never make
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 06/05/16 21:58, Cale Gibbard wrote:
> I can't really be the only one here who thinks that this kind of
> discussion of extensions to the syntax of Haskell is totally
> inappropriate when we have a large number of already implemented
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 06/05/16 19:22, David Luposchainsky wrote:
> Just for confirmation, you meant
>
>> > [ Foo
>> > , Bar
>> > , Fu
>> > , Baz ]
> and not
>
>> > [ Foo
>> > , Bar
>> > , Fu
>> > , Baz
>> > ]
> in your email, right?
Yes. The latter is how I have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 06/05/16 18:34, Iavor Diatchki wrote:
> I am not convinced by the argument that this will help make 'diffs'
> considerably simpler: we have tools for visualizing diffs,
Most people I know read plaintext patches in emails. Others use things
like
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Haskell uses separators for values in a number of syntactic
constructs. It is my understanding of the 2010 report that the
language does however not generally support leading separators, nor
trailing separators, nor both (two exceptions are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 05/10/15 11:59, Simon Thompson wrote:
> There’s an old fashioned maxim that sums this up in a pithy way:
> “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it”.
But... it *is* broken.
- --
Alexander
alexan...@plaimi.net
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 05/10/15 15:16, Brandon Allbery wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 8:16 AM, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
>> But... it *is* broken.
> Somehow, we managed to use Monad before this. That does not sound
> "broken".
Just because
