Iavor report? My understanding is that the intention is that the
Iavor alphabet is unicode codepoints (sometimes referred to as
Iavor unicode characters).
Unicode characters are not the same as Unicode codepoints. What we want
is Unicode characters.
We don't want to be able to
Roel == Roel van Dijk vandijk.r...@gmail.com writes:
Roel On 6 April 2011 20:42, Colin Paul Adams co...@colina.demon.co.uk
wrote:
Roel It seems you have a problem with the word allowed. What do
Roel you think of the interoperability guidelines as proposed by
Roel Duncan
I forgot to CC the list:
Roel == Roel van Dijk vandijk.r...@gmail.com writes:
Roel I propose to make UTF-8 the only allowed encoding for Haskell
Roel source files. Implementations must discard an initial Byte
Roel Order Mark (BOM) if present [3].
Roel * Pros - Ensures that
Bas == Bas van Dijk v.dijk@gmail.com writes:
Bas On 6 April 2011 17:34, Colin Paul Adams co...@colina.demon.co.uk
wrote:
Allowed? Allowed for what?
Bas Allowed to be called a Haskell file.
Well, what the report says on that is irrelevant. If I see a file
containing Haskell
