Re: [Haskell] The Haskell Report: who maintains it?

All of us on the Haskell Language Committee have the ability to commit on that repo. I think typos are uncontroversial and I'll happily merge pull requests like that. I think the pull-request you point out suffered from the bystander effect, unfortunately. I'll review and merge it now. If you

Re: Default module header `module Main where`

Agreed, this sounds sensible. Can anyone think of any unintended consequences? -Jose On Tue, May 16, 2017, at 09:50 AM, Iavor Diatchki wrote: > That seems fairly reasonable to me. > > -Iavor > > On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 7:18 AM, Joachim Breitner breitner.de> wrote:>> Hi, >>

Re: Meet up at ICFP?

be posted. Thanks Richard! Thanks everyone, Jose On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 8:08 PM, José Manuel Calderón Trilla <j...@jmct.cc> wrote: > Hello Haskell Prime, > > On IRC Andres Löh suggested that we have a haskell prime gathering > that coincides with ICFP. I told him that I'd

Re: Starting point for new standard?

Hello Christian, On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Christian Siefkes wrote: > Hi all, > > out of curiosity, what'll be the starting point for the next Haskell report? > I suppose Haskell 2010 plus the additional "No Datatype Contexts" change > accepted by the old Haskell

Re: Evaluation order control between two expressions

On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 6:11 AM, Lennart Augustsson wrote: > Order of evaluation can be very important for memory use. So I can imagine > cases where seq would run out of memory, but pseq would not. > That's fair enough. Do you think it's worth attempting to standardize

Re: Chairship / responsibility

On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 4:03 PM, John Wiegley wrote: >> Henrik Nilsson writes: > >>> It was my understanding that Herbert would be the chair when I asked to be >>> on the committee, and the fact that this question was already answer was

Re: Evaluation order control between two expressions

Hello Takenobu, Great question, this is actually a pretty interesting issue! It isn't out of scope at all. The first thing to think about is the following thought experiment: Without the presence of side-effects, how can you tell the difference between a `seq` that conforms to the Haskell

Re: Infrastructure & Communication

Hello, First of all, thanks for all your effort in setting this up! On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 5:56 PM, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote: > > However, since Trac has accumulated quite a bit of old content in its > ticket-tracker over the years, and "Haskell 2020" has been coined a

Re: Haskell Prime 2020 committee

There seems to be a minimum of 5 characters for a username, which was giving me the “Username doesn't match local naming policy.” error. I was able to make an account with a longer username, but I am not able to edit the wiki. Unsure if it's some sort of anti-spam delay or some other issue with

Update on Haskell Prime reboot?

Hello all, I'm curious if there is any progress on the reboot of the Haskell Prime committee. It has been six months since the closing of nominations and there hasn't been any word that I'm aware of. I've also spoken to a few others that have self-nominated and they too have not heard any news.

Self-nomination

Hello everyone, I would also like to nominate myself for the Haskell committee reboot. I'm currently finishing my PhD at the University of York, just submitted last week and going to defend in the next few months. I will be starting at Galois later this month but cannot claim to speak for the