On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 03:36:55PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
But before we get carried away figuring out all the pros and cons of
various options, let me point out once again that
This is just a marketing decision
Because
(a) we're going to standardise concurrency anyway
Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(a) we're going to standardise concurrency anyway
Well, but that only begs the question, what *kind* of concurrency are we
going to standardise on? e.g. Will we admit all variations of scheduling
(co-operative, time-slice, and pre-emptive)?
(b) it is
On 26 March 2006 02:31, isaac jones wrote:
Possible Interests:
1. I can write tools like filesystems, web servers, and GUIs in
Haskell'
2. Libraries that I use are thread-safe
3. I can compile my code with any Haskell' compiler
4. Tools such as debuggers and tracers that claim to
