2= e2
> >...
> >| gm= em
> >where { decls }
>
> I did not even know these things existed, is there anyone who actually
> uses general pattern bindings?
It is worth mentioning that such pattern bindings are not only used at
the top-level - t
Hello Twan,
Saturday, April 14, 2007, 5:43:03 AM, you wrote:
> I did not even know these things existed, is there anyone who actually
> uses general pattern bindings?
b:kb:mb:gb:_ = iterate (1024*) 1
unfortunately, they got monotypes, so at last end i finished with
simpler defin
Hi Twan,
> In the interest of removing things from the standard, I found this in
> the Haskell 98 report (section 4.4.3.2):
Great idea to remove things, but keep your hands off extended pattern
guards! I've got at least 3 instances of that in the module that is
currently open on my screen. I'v
cture as for function bindings above; in other words, a
> > pattern binding is:
> >
> > p | g1= e1
> > | g2= e2
> > ...
> > | gm= em
> > where { decls }
>
> I did not even know these things existed, is there anyone who
p | g1= e1
>| g2= e2
>...
>| gm= em
>where { decls }
I did not even know these things existed, is there anyone who actually
uses general pattern bindings?
If not, the question becomes whether removing these bindings would
improve the language. It can
