Good to know!
It's important to keep morale up and do what we can. I imagine that'll
be small details in my case, but there's meaningful modernisation to be
done even if major type system features are still too difficult to
standardise just yet.
On 03/12/2018 21:23, Carter Schonwald wrote:
i'm slowly prepping some stuff for ghc and the committee, though i can't
say about the general action. I do think some stuff i've got planned should
make its way in, i cant speak for other folks etc etc
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 5:54 AM Anthony Clayden <
anthony_clay...@clear.net.nz> wrote:
> On
On *Thu Nov 29 15:00:19 UTC 2018, Doug McIlroy wrote:*
> >* Frankly after you've filtered out all that, I'd be astonished if you**
have anything left. It seems to be usual practice on Hackage to switch** on
a swag of LANGUAGE pragmas even if this module isn't using them.*
>>* (MPTCs,
*On 2018-11-28 14:03:30 UTC, **Mario Blažević wrote:*
>> On 2018-11-28 2:17 a.m., Jurriaan Hage wrote:
>
>>* do we actually have something like an extensive set of tests*
>>* to throw at any Haskell 2010 compliant compiler that would help find
>>mistakes on our parr?*
> If you want to be
On 2018-11-28 2:17 a.m., Jurriaan Hage wrote:
Dear all,
We’ve been active since September making the Helium compiler more Haskell 2010
compliant.
In particular, we have a branch with support for Haskell 2010 type classes, a
branch that
supports import/export following the standard, and a
Dear all,
We’ve been active since September making the Helium compiler more Haskell 2010
compliant.
In particular, we have a branch with support for Haskell 2010 type classes, a
branch that
supports import/export following the standard, and a branch that compiles to
LLVM instead
of the `old’
