On 31/05/2016, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote:
> I'd rather suggest to have 2 Git repos, to keep the concerns separate.
> And I think we can just start out with such a 2nd GitHub repo and
> make the process up as we go. At this point we should just get moving, as I
> sense many
Hello!
On 2016-05-31 at 19:50:54 +0200, Iavor Diatchki wrote:
> what is the status of the discussion about how we should collaborate?
> I am not picky and would be happy to use whatever tools others prefer.
> If it was left to me, I'd use: 1) a git repo on github, which contains
> the current