egards,
> > Philip
> >
> >
> >
> > Van: Glasgow-haskell-users
> > namens Merijn Verstraaten
> > Verzonden: zaterdag 16 augustus 2014 00:40
> > Aan: haskell-prime@haskell.org; glasgow-haskell-us...@haskell.o
ens
> Merijn Verstraaten
> Verzonden: zaterdag 16 augustus 2014 00:40
> Aan: haskell-prime@haskell.org; glasgow-haskell-us...@haskell.org
> Onderwerp: Revival: PROPOSAL: Literate haskell and module file names
>
> Ola!
>
> I raised this proposal earlier this year and got to
Ola!
I raised this proposal earlier this year and got to busy to follow up, this
week I was suddenly reminded and decided to reraise this. To summarise the
discussion up until this point:
There was no real opposition to the general idea, the only real objection to
the original proposal was tha
On 17/03/2014 13:08, Edward Kmett wrote:
Foo+rst.lhs does nicely dodge the collision with jhc.
How does ghc do the search now? By trying each alternative in turn?
Yes - see compiler/main/Finder.hs
Cheers,
Simon
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Merijn Verstraaten
mailto:mer...@inconsist
2014-03-17 14:22 GMT+01:00 Brandon Allbery :
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Edward Kmett wrote:
>>
>> Foo+rst.lhs does nicely dodge the collision with jhc.
>
>
> Is this legal on Windows?
According to
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa365247(v=vs.85).aspx
it is, altho
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Edward Kmett wrote:
> Foo+rst.lhs does nicely dodge the collision with jhc.
>
Is this legal on Windows?
--
brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates
allber...@gmail.com ballb...@sinenomine.net
Foo+rst.lhs does nicely dodge the collision with jhc.
How does ghc do the search now? By trying each alternative in turn?
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Merijn Verstraaten
wrote:
> I agree that this could collide, see my beginning remark that I believe
> that the report should provide a min
I agree that this could collide, see my beginning remark that I believe that
the report should provide a minimal specification how to map modules to
filenames and vice versa.
Anyhoo, I'm not married to this specific suggestion. Carter suggested
"Foo+rst.lhs" on IRC, other options would be "Foo.
One problem with Foo.*.hs or even Foo.md.hs mapping to the module name
Foois that as I recall JHC will look for
Data.Vector in Data.Vector.hs as well as Data/Vector.hs
This means that on a case insensitive file system Foo.MD.hs matches both
conventions.
Do I want to block an change to GHC because
Ola!
I didn't know what the most appropriate venue for this proposal was so I
crossposted to haskell-prime and glasgow-haskell-users, if this isn't the right
venue I welcome advice where to take this proposal.
Currently the report does not specify the mapping between filenames and module
names
10 matches
Mail list logo
