On 29 March 2006 10:16, John Meacham wrote:
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 03:36:55PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
(b) it is unlikely that Hugs or JHC will implement concurrency
even if it goes into the standard
Well, if the standard is unimplemented for certain compilers, I think
we need
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 11:56:41AM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
Fair enough - I take that as a vote for a concurrency addendum.
Actually, I think there is a lot we can standardize in a portable way
when it comes to concurrency without compromising the ability for any
compiler to implement it and I
John Meacham:
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 11:56:41AM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
Fair enough - I take that as a vote for a concurrency addendum.
Actually, I think there is a lot we can standardize in a portable way
when it comes to concurrency without compromising the ability for any
compiler
