On 04/05/2010 17:28, Ben wrote:
a quick question -- i'm assuming that maintaining two versions is
out? this is what they do with python 2.7 and 3.1 (and a variety of
other systems, like BSD.) it seems like making one version of the
system work against two specifications is hard; of course, mai
a quick question -- i'm assuming that maintaining two versions is
out? this is what they do with python 2.7 and 3.1 (and a variety of
other systems, like BSD.) it seems like making one version of the
system work against two specifications is hard; of course, maintaining
two separate systems is a
On 02/05/2010 13:57, Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 05:05:17PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
I'd appreciate a few more eyes over this, in particular look out for
messed up typesetting as there could still be a few bugs lurking.
In the PDF:
p129-137: A "program" can only contain a "mo
On 01/05/2010 13:18, Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 05:05:17PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
I've completed most of the edits to the Haskell 98 report for Haskell
2010, modulo the changes to the libraries that we still have to resolve.
I cleaned up various other things I discovered alon
On 30/04/2010 17:58, Sean Leather wrote:
I'd appreciate a few more eyes over this, in particular look out for
messed up typesetting as there could still be a few bugs lurking.
In the HTML version, there are a few cases where section numbers are
missing from the subsection headers in the
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 05:05:17PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
>
> I'd appreciate a few more eyes over this, in particular look out for
> messed up typesetting as there could still be a few bugs lurking.
In the PDF:
p166: Does anything support these?:
DoAndIfThenElse, HierarchicalModul
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 05:05:17PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
>
> I'd appreciate a few more eyes over this, in particular look out for
> messed up typesetting as there could still be a few bugs lurking.
In the PDF:
p129-137: A "program" can only contain a "modid" as part of a
"qvarid"
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 05:05:17PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
> I've completed most of the edits to the Haskell 98 report for Haskell
> 2010, modulo the changes to the libraries that we still have to resolve.
>
> I cleaned up various other things I discovered along the way, and tidied
> up the
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 05:05:17PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
>
> I'd appreciate a few more eyes over this, in particular look out for
> messed up typesetting as there could still be a few bugs lurking.
In the PDF:
p10: Typo "Februrary"
p10: The new (purple) bullet points do not end in full sto
> I'd appreciate a few more eyes over this, in particular look out for messed
> up typesetting as there could still be a few bugs lurking.
>
In the HTML version, there are a few cases where section numbers are missing
from the subsection headers in the TOC. I see at least 11 and 22.
In the PDF, i
I'd appreciate a few more eyes over this, in particular look out for
messed up typesetting as there could still be a few bugs lurking.
"Modified versions of this Report may also be copied and
distributed for any purpose, provided that the modified version is
clearly presented as such, a
11 matches
Mail list logo
