On 3/29/06, Simon Peyton-Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Proposal: make all pattern bindings completely monomorphic
(regardless of type signatures)
...
My bet is that this is a
feature that is tricky to implement, but which is virtually never used.
If this proposal
On 3/28/06, isaac jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only topics that should remain open are concurrency and
the class system.
What happene to bullet 3, perhaps standard libraries?
Jim
___
Haskell-prime mailing list
Haskell-prime@haskell.org
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 21:16 -0500, Jim Apple wrote:
On 3/28/06, isaac jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only topics that should remain open are concurrency and
the class system.
What happene to bullet 3, perhaps standard libraries?
We're still trying to figure out exactly what the 3rd
On 2006-03-29, isaac jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 21:16 -0500, Jim Apple wrote:
On 3/28/06, isaac jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only topics that should remain open are concurrency and
the class system.
What happene to bullet 3, perhaps standard libraries?
| As mentioned in my email from Tuesday March 21 [1], I'd like to bring
| most threads to a close very soon, and to document your discussions on
| the wiki. The only topics that should remain open are concurrency and
Just before we do I'd like to mention one point that John Hughes and I
