(warning. rambling)
On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 09:06:24AM +, Ross Paterson wrote:
On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 03:11:10PM +0100, John Hughes wrote:
I noticed ticket #55--add parallel list comprehensions--which according to
the ticket, will probably be adopted. I would argue against.
As there
oops, sorry for the double post. I accidentally sent a draft along with
the final result.
John
--
John Meacham - ⑆repetae.net⑆john⑈
___
Haskell-prime mailing list
Haskell-prime@haskell.org
http://haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
Dear all,
Conor wrote:
You forgot to define the term behaviour also. Pattern synonyms may be
used to construct as well as to match values.
Conor and I discussed this over lunch.
Specifically, we talked about whether the right hand side of a pattern
synonym would be any Haskell pattern
Ross Paterson wrote:
I don't think the original name is inappropriate: the feature described
is certainly existential quantification, albeit restricted to
alternatives of data definitions.
I think that existential quantification should mean, well, existential
quantification, in the sense that
Isaac Jones wrote:
My intuition (and a proposal) is that our job will be to:
1. conservatively standardize some of the most robust extensions,
2. clean up the class hierarchies and some libraries,
3. solve the MPTC dilemma (see above), and
4. pick one other big idea such as records or bang
Hello
I would like to propose two pragmas to be included in Haskell'
for use with FFI. One for specifying the include file defining
the foreign import (INCLUDE in ghc) and an another for defining
a library that the foreign import depends on, called FFI_LIB
(not implemented at the moment). These
