Re: Haskell 2020: 'let' to be optional and with wider scope of visibility, like other Haskell functions

2017-04-17 Thread Sven Panne
2017-04-17 14:19 GMT+02:00 Adam Bergmark : > I just wanted to say that there is no need to apologize for making a > proposal! > +1 for that, and sorry if I sounded harsh, that wasn't my intention. Proposals are important (we need more of them, not less), and so are discussions about them. Nothing

Re: Haskell 2020: 'let' to be optional and with wider scope of visibility, like other Haskell functions

2017-04-17 Thread Adam Bergmark
Hi Vassil, I just wanted to say that there is no need to apologize for making a proposal! Cheers, Adam On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 at 00:57 Michael Walker wrote: > I feel that if people are confused about whether to use "let x = ..." > or "x <- ...", changing the syntax to remove the "let" won't help