Re: Remove eq and show from num class

> On Fri Sep 8 15:58:10 UTC 2017, Carter Schonwald wrote: > > I mostly wanted to confirm that we in fact will actually say yes > before doing the formal writtingup :) Seriously -- and please stop using smileys: you're right to be cautious. You need to rewrite the whole of Section 6.4 (nearly 5

Re: Shall the Haskell Report remain in LaTeX?

I personally kinda enjoy latex. Granted that's assuming it's well written :) On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 2:41 PM Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote: > Hello *, > > On 2017-09-08 at 00:46:52 +0200, Mario Blazevic wrote: > > [...] > > >> If the report was written in reStructuredText we

Shall the Haskell Report remain in LaTeX?

Hello *, On 2017-09-08 at 00:46:52 +0200, Mario Blazevic wrote: [...] >> If the report was written in reStructuredText we could simply use >> something like the readthedocs.org service. But since it's LaTeX, we >> have to do a little bit more work to publishes ("deploys" in newspeak) >> .pdf

Re: Remove eq and show from num class

2017-09-08 10:43 GMT+02:00 Herbert Valerio Riedel : > [...] Moreover, the CLC together with the Hackage Trustees also maintains > the > https://github.com/haskell/pvp specification which is integral to the > way Hackage and the Cabal solver interact. [...] > Although I'm