not
feel that stretching the syntax in this way warrants the loss in
possibilities to check for errors.
regards,
- Atze -
Atze Dijkstra, Department of Information and Computing Sciences. /|\
Utrecht University, PO Box 80089, 3508 TB Utrecht, Netherlands. / | \
Tel.: +31-30-2534093
/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
___
Haskell-prime mailing list
Haskell-prime@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
- Atze -
Atze Dijkstra, Department of Information and Computing Sciences. /|\
Utrecht
In UHC it was unpleasant to make it work, because in (e) and (e +) it
only is detected just before the closing parenthesis which of the two
alternatives (i.e. parenthesized or sectioned expression) must be
chosen. The use of LL parsing aggravates this somewhat, so the
required
-prime
- Atze -
Atze Dijkstra, Department of Information and Computing Sciences. /|\
Utrecht University, PO Box 80089, 3508 TB Utrecht, Netherlands. / | \
Tel.: +31-30-2534118/1454 | WWW : http://www.cs.uu.nl/~atze . /--| \
Fax : +31-30-2513971 | Email: a...@cs.uu.nl
, or at least clearly identifying
the differences, if any.
___
Haskell-prime mailing list
Haskell-prime@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
- Atze -
Atze Dijkstra, Department of Information
the
choice of meaning (i.e. bang pattern or infix operator) depend on a LANGUAGE
pragma, (re)defining ! is not that common anyway.
cheers,
- Atze -
Atze Dijkstra, Department of Information and Computing Sciences. /|\
Utrecht University, PO Box 80089, 3508 TB Utrecht, Netherlands