On 23/02/06, Bulat Ziganshin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello John,
Thursday, February 23, 2006, 4:07:52 PM, you wrote:
JM That is the plan. none of the current Array implementations will
JM change, they will still be instances of both MArray and HasBounds. it is
JM just that HasBounds will
| Perhaps this e-mail could be read more generally as a
| request to consistencify/update the (Data) libraries
| in general
...
|
| Is this possible for Haskell'? Or is this too much
| of a break? If it's possible, I'm happy to build a
| wiki page for discussion (I noticed that a short page
Hello Ben,
Wednesday, February 22, 2006, 9:47:19 PM, you wrote:
BRG While we're on the topic, I have a couple of problems with the current
array
BRG system that cut deeper than the naming:
BRG * The function for getting the bounds of an MArray is pure, so the
BRGinterface can't
alson:
We had a short discussion on the IRC channel the other
day about Arrays. I advocated that we do some
refactoring work and didn't meet with overwhelming
disagreement, so I wanted to propose that the Arrays
interfaces be refactored in Haskell'.
As a Haskell new-ish-bie, the various
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 03:39:48PM +1100, Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
And unsafeRead/unsafeWrite are too verbose. They are usually (almost
always?) safe (since the code does its own checks),
The same can be said about most uses of unsafePerformIO - you wouldn't
be using it if you weren't
