Dan Doel wrote:
If you do want to generalize (.), you have to decide whether you
want to generalize it as composition of arrows, or as functor application.
The former isn't a special case of the latter (with the current Functor, at
least).
By annotating functors with the category they
Am Mittwoch, 23. April 2008 23:55 schrieb Cale Gibbard:
[…]
Rename fmap to map
This would be really great! There is no point in having a map just for lists
and a general map for functors since the list map is the same as the list
instance’s functor map. And identifiers with a single
2008/4/24 Wolfgang Jeltsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Am Mittwoch, 23. April 2008 23:55 schrieb Cale Gibbard:
[…]
Rename fmap to map
This would be really great! There is no point in having a map just for lists
and a general map for functors since the list map is the same as the list
On Thursday 24 April 2008, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
I don’t think that this is reasonable. (.) corresponds to the little
circle in math which is a composition. So (.) = () would be far better.
Were I building a library, this might be the direction I'd take things.
They're two incompatible
2008/4/24 Dan Doel [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thursday 24 April 2008, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
I don't think that this is reasonable. (.) corresponds to the little
circle in math which is a composition. So (.) = () would be far better.
Were I building a library, this might be the direction
Cale Gibbard wrote:
Hello,
In keeping with my small but seemingly extremely controversial
suggestions for changes to the Prelude, here's a suggestion which I
think is elegant and worth considering for the Haskell' Prelude:
Rename fmap to map (like it was in Haskell 1.4), and define (.) as a
2008/4/24 Twan van Laarhoven [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Cale Gibbard wrote:
Hello,
In keeping with my small but seemingly extremely controversial
suggestions for changes to the Prelude, here's a suggestion which I
think is elegant and worth considering for the Haskell' Prelude:
Rename
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 6:06 PM, Twan van Laarhoven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cale Gibbard wrote:
Hello,
In keeping with my small but seemingly extremely controversial
suggestions for changes to the Prelude, here's a suggestion which I
think is elegant and worth considering for the
2008/4/24 David Menendez [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 6:06 PM, Twan van Laarhoven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cale Gibbard wrote:
Hello,
In keeping with my small but seemingly extremely controversial
suggestions for changes to the Prelude, here's a suggestion
Hello,
In keeping with my small but seemingly extremely controversial
suggestions for changes to the Prelude, here's a suggestion which I
think is elegant and worth considering for the Haskell' Prelude:
Rename fmap to map (like it was in Haskell 1.4), and define (.) as a
synonym for it.
10 matches
Mail list logo
