Re: Unary operators [was: Re: ~ patterns]

2006-02-03 Thread Bulat Ziganshin
Hello Benjamin, Friday, February 03, 2006, 2:29:47 AM, you wrote: (+ x) --- (? + x) i like this idea! but i tink that it's too late for such incompatible change :( really, unary operators can be added to language without any troubles. we need only to prohibit using of the same symbol for unary

Re: Unary operators [was: Re: ~ patterns]

2006-02-03 Thread Thomas Davie
On Feb 3, 2006, at 9:34 AM, Bulat Ziganshin wrote: Hello Benjamin, Friday, February 03, 2006, 2:29:47 AM, you wrote: (+ x) --- (? + x) i like this idea! but i tink that it's too late for such incompatible change :( really, unary operators can be added to language without any troubles.

Re: Unary operators [was: Re: ~ patterns]

2006-02-02 Thread Taral
On 2/2/06, Benjamin Franksen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This would open the possibility to allow unary (prefix) operators in general which I find rather more useful than sections. Down that road lies APL. -- Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED] Computer science is no more about computers than astronomy is