Re: Which GUI on X11R6 ?

1999-08-03 Thread Grigoriy Strokin
On Mon, 2 Aug 1999, Alex Ferguson wrote: Wilhelm B. Kloke: has anybody there an idea which GUI is usable with Haskell 98 on a Unix/X11R6 system (FreeBSD to be complete)? It seems that all GUI stuff develepmont (Fudgets, Haggis ...) has been stalled since some years. I'd look at

Re: The dreaded layout rule

1999-08-03 Thread Christian Sievers
I wrote: lexeme - qvarid | qconid | qvarsym | qconsym | literal | special | reservedop | reservedid Now we could replace qvarsym and qconsym by qop, and have both examples parse in the same way. However, unlike the other change in lexeme's definition, I don't suggest this, I

Re: The dreaded layout rule

1999-08-03 Thread Guy Lapalme
As an author of an Haskell Emacs mode that deals with the layout rule (described in Journal of Functional Programming 8(5) 493-502), I strongly agree that the "parse-error condition" is really a bad idea. For example, in Emacs, no full Haskell parse is done. After all, layout should be there to

Re: Which GUI on X11R6 ?

1999-08-03 Thread Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
has anybody there an idea which GUI is usable with Haskell 98 on a Unix/X11R6 system (FreeBSD to be complete)? I am working at a Haskell binding for GTK+ (the currently probably most popular open source GUI): http://www.score.is.tsukuba.ac.jp/~chak/haskell/gtk/ Cheers, Manuel

Can't compile ParseIFace.hs (again)

1999-08-03 Thread George Russell
And yes, happy is up-to-date, perhaps too much so. I get various mismatch errors. For example % is used in ParseIFace.hs, but GHC can't find it. When I tried getting rid of that, I got other messages: ParseIface.hs:5633: Couldn't match `EncodedFS' against `[Char]' Expected type:

Re: ghc from CVS (1999/07/31) throws core...

1999-08-03 Thread Kevin GLYNN
Hmmm, just a me-too :-( it dies very quickly, just after a couple of calls to times according to strace and possibly in a function called Main_main_info() according to gdb. k Michael Weber writes: But my core dumps, don't give any "blahblah exception (core dumped)" messages.

RE: Compiling 4.04 on SPARC

1999-08-03 Thread Simon Marlow
I figure this isn't a problem with GHC, necessarily. More likely a problem with my environment, but I thought I'd ask here anyway, if only to get a clue. The problem is when the "gmake all" gets to building hsc, I get the following errors: ld: elf error: file

RE: ghc from CVS (1999/07/31) throws core...

1999-08-03 Thread Simon Marlow
I wish, I could have provided more debugging info, but strace's and gdb's output isn't very helpful at all. How do I enable those IF_DEBUG(...) macros (or something that helps tracking down the problem)? I tried, but it seems I overlooked something... I add the following lines to my

RE: Can't compile ParseIFace.hs (again)

1999-08-03 Thread Simon Marlow
And yes, happy is up-to-date, perhaps too much so. I get various mismatch errors. For example % is used in ParseIFace.hs, but GHC can't find it. When I tried getting rid of that, I got other messages: ParseIface.hs:5633: Couldn't match `EncodedFS' against `[Char]' Expected

Re: Can't compile ParseIFace.hs (again)

1999-08-03 Thread George Russell
OK, I think I have the solution. The problem was that happy wasn't getting updated as I thought it was (doing cvs update . in the fptools directory isn't enough) and so I have an ancient template. Sorry.

RE: ghc from CVS (1999/07/31) throws core...

1999-08-03 Thread Simon Marlow
$ cat tmp.lhs module Main( main ) where main = putStr $ show q where q = quot 1 0 $ ghc-4.02 tmp.lhs ghc-4.02: module version changed to 176; reason: usages changed 1006 swift ~/ghc/constraints/mixed $ a.out Fail: Prelude.Integral.quot{Integer}: divide by 0 1007 swift

Re: gcc2.95 and GHC

1999-08-03 Thread Michael V. Nikolaev
Hello, George! I'm tested GHC 4.03 and 4.04 with gcc2.95 (Cygwin32, WinNT4 SP5). In both cases the result was the same, STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION, for any GHC-source. I think, it is due to GCC run-time changed. Best regards, Michael - Original Message - From: George Russell [EMAIL

RE: gcc2.95 and GHC

1999-08-03 Thread Simon Marlow
Do these two work together? (I believe gcc2.95 is supposed to be descended from egcs, which is supposed to sort-of-work with GHC). I haven't got around to testing it yet, but I'll let you know as soon as I do. Cheers, Simon