Overloading

Should the following be legal or not? data T a = F (a->a->Bool) x = F (==) The compilers all produce an `ambiguous overloading' error, and I am not sure why. Everything is OK if you give a type declaration for x (x :: Eq a => T a) or if you add an argum

Haskell 1.3

re import M1 (T(A,B), ...) renaming (B to C) data T = A | C However, it would be safe to allow, in interface files only, an import to specify a subset of the constructors (at least those that are renamed). The full set appears later anyway. All this applies to class methods

Workshop

rews RD, Backwell, Bristol BS19 3NR tel: 0275 464 257 Registration Form - Name: Address: Tel: Email Address: Price you will pay: --- Ian[E

BRISK 0.0

comes with a collection of small test programs. It is available by anonymous ftp from ftp.cs.bris.ac.uk, /pub/functional/brisk. Comments are welcome. Ian[EMAIL PROTECTED], Tel: 0272 303334

Haskell 1.3

in the report. A notable case is that the functions associated with a class are variously called methods, operations, or operators. The last of these is surely wrong. o A number of other minor matters are raised by the tests available by anonymous ftp from ftp.cs.bris.ac.uk, d

Brisk

The ftp directory for brisk at ftp.cs.bris.ac.uk is /functional/brisk, not /pub/functional/brisk. Sorry, and thanks to Kent Karlsson for pointing this out. Ian[EMAIL PROTECTED], Tel: 0272 303334

Haskell 1.3 trivia

readInt (so that it matches showInt) and rename the current readInt as readRadix or something? Ian[EMAIL PROTECTED], Tel: 0272 303334

Re: Haskell 1.3 trivia

5.2 *already* uses the term body for the topdecls alone, in contradiction to the current syntax. *) do the same for interfaces in 5.3 (we don't want modules and interfaces in the same file, do we?) and change B.4, B.5, B.6 to match. Ian

Strictness

en brisk is further advanced, I can make some of these ideas more concrete. Ian[EMAIL PROTECTED], Tel: 0272 303334

Re: Strictness

ogic hold for {True,False}, but not when you include _|_. It is not reasonable to have unlifted booleans, is it? Which value would you choose to identify _|_ with?:-) Ian[EMAIL PROTECTED], Tel: 0272 303334

Legal problems

o do a check for the right number of arguments on entry to every function. Ian[EMAIL PROTECTED], Tel: 0272 303334

Haskell 1.3

s both have some nasty problems (eg Warren Burton's recent comments) and that both need a more thorough redesign for Haskell 2.0. Ian[EMAIL PROTECTED], Tel: 0272 303334

Re: Modules and type classes

ould be imported along with it. I believe Haskell current rules do ensure this, but are not liberal enough. Ian[EMAIL PROTECTED], Tel: 0272 303334

Validation suite

e, if people agree. Send us your pathological programs, preferably short ones which make a point. Ian[EMAIL PROTECTED], Tel: 0272 303334

Suggestion for monad syntax

eans: what good does it do, and what harm? I think that for certain operations, particularly in the IO monad, a declaration form does add clarity. Others may disagree, and say that Haskell is terse enough as it is. Comments, anyone? ( Implementation, anyone? ) Ian Stark. ..

Re: bad pattern-matching

er to read, and I've never quite understood why n in (n+k) should match only non-negative integers. Ian

Re: Monads and their operational behavior

ies for eliminating indirection-like constructs such as "y = snd (e1,e2)" either in the garbage collector or in a low-priority background process. Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~ian

Re: Pattern Match Success Changes Types

have to admit I was a bit taken aback by this, but I think it is an instance of polymorphism and overloading being just so convenient you forget that they are there: those two uses of `Right' look so much, well, the same. Ian Stark .....

standards and libraries

xpecting one soon, but it is a very obvious gap. Ian[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~ian

Re: numerics in Haskell

;arbitrary precision" the same as true real numbers --- or does it just mean "for this run of the program I would like to use 10^5 digits" ? Ian Stark . Ian Stark http://www.dcs.ed.ac.uk/home/stark Department of Computer Science, The University of Edinburgh, Scotland

Haskell '98

than the current Haskell community is important. Taking the two-digit year suggests a lifetime for Haskell '98 of more than a year and less than a century, which seems safe enough. Ian On Stable & Current Haskell, what is going to happen when we next want to take a marker on Current Haskel

Re: types with value parameter (another example of application)

1995. Also published as Technical Report 391, University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory. For a copy, send email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---- Dr Ian StarkOffice: 2506 Division of Informatics

Re: The dreaded layout rule

8 and imperfect). -- Ian[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~ian --F93F7E72348E2F23CC7D1D40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; name="Layout.hs" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: in

Re: Haskell Report 1.2

> Let's either disallow (n+k) pattern bindings or always resolve the > ambiguity as an (n+k) pattern. I'd prefer the former, but I never > use (n+k) patterns, anyway. Likewise! > Kevin Ian

Re: Clean and Haskell

Steve Tarsk writes ("Clean and Haskell"): > I just want to say that Haskell is a fat old slow > dinosaur compared with Clean. Download Clean at > www.cs.kun.nl/~clean and get rid of your Haskell > installation. Without getting into the merits of the languages per se, for me and many other people

Re: Clean and Haskell

Jerzy Karczmarczuk writes ("Re: Clean and Haskell"): > Ian Jackson: > > The operating system I run on my computers, Debian (www.debian.org), > > consists only of software and documentation to which I have (or can > > download) the source code, which I can use at wor

The Clean type system

olved this, but reinventing this yourself can take a long, > long time. I'm interested in this; does "parts of the type checker that were undefined" mean that they just hadn't been written, or that the type system itself is unclear? Is the Clean type sys

Re: rounding in haskell

George rightly points out how tricky trig functions are. My own favourite curious operation is subtraction: Prelude> 1.0 - 0.8 - 0.2 -1.49012e-08 ---- Ian Stark http://www.dcs.ed.ac.uk/home/stark L

Re: rounding in haskell

(entirely sensible) mechanics of floating-point arithmetic. -------- Ian Stark http://www.dcs.ed.ac.uk/home/stark LFCS, Division of Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, Scotland

ghc-4.06-1.src.rpm

pecify build-time requirements (as distinct from install-time). This is a particular problem when devising an RPM for a package written in any language which gcc cannot compile. Can anyone confirm that version 3 does have this feature? Is it sufficient to describe the bootstrapping of self-compilin

Performance, and algorithms

function. Also, the manual says that an Array is not strict in its contents, which doesn't seem helpful to me. Ian.

Who is the webmaster for haskell.org ?

I tried to report a broken link on www.haskell.org, but the page had no attribution or contact address at the bottom, and no in the , so I mailed `[EMAIL PROTECTED]' - but that address doesn't exist. Who should I contact ? Thanks, Ian. Mail Delivery System writes ("Undelivere

Re: Show class on ADT with function

here? Eq and Read too, though they do become tricky at Int->Int. ---- Ian Stark http://www.dcs.ed.ac.uk/home/stark LFCS, Division of Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, Scotland

RE: Haskell -> Java bytecode?

Simon said: > GHC has a Java back end in development. You say ghc -J Foo.hs to produce > Foo.java. Any particular reason for generating Java rather than JVM bytecode? Does it make a difference? ---- Dr Ian

MD5 in Haskell

x27;t know if a better optimised version could be written although I may look into this). I've put the code at http://c93.keble.ox.ac.uk/~ian/md5/ License is GPL. Ian ___ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell

Re: MD5 in Haskell

On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 07:11:40PM +, Ian Lynagh wrote: > > I've put the code at http://c93.keble.ox.ac.uk/~ian/md5/ > > License is GPL. 0.1.1 now there which changes the license to GPL/BSD so it can be used as a drop-in replacement for th

Doing IO in foldr repeats lines?

-> String -> IO Int > foo io_l s = do l <- io_l > () <- putStr s > io_l prints (with both GHC and hugs): qq ww qq ee qq ww qq and I really don't understand why. Is

Re: Doing IO in foldr repeats lines?

On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 05:08:48PM -0500, Scott Turner wrote: > At 21:17 2001-01-20 +0000, Ian Lynagh wrote: > > main = do _ <- foldl foo (return 14) ["qq\n", "ww\n", "ee\n"] > > putStr "" > >

Unicode and is*

report (primUnicodeIsUpper -- 'A'..'Z') are also misleading. Thanks Ian ___ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell

Prelude and (:) and []((:), []) bugs?

As far as I can tell, the report doesn't allow (:) or []((:), []) in the export list, yet the hugs prelude has the first and the GHC prelude has the second. Have I missed something that allows them or is this a bug in the preludes or the report? Thank

Re: Prelude and (:) and []((:), []) bugs?

l > extensions, and just reduce the amount of built-in compiler magic needed > to express the Prelude. I think it would be nice if the prelude was valid Haskell 98 - if these extensions are useful and natural, and as I can't see how they could break existing code, could they be put int

Layout rule

if m /=0 (Note 5) would be clearer. In fact as the preeceding text says 'and "" for the empty stream' I think it may be written correctly but have gotten lost in the conversion from whatever it is really written in. Thanks Ian ___

Lexical syntax and context free grammar in report

lieve should be aexp_ { fbind1 , ... , fbindn } Thanks Ian, who's going to have to rejig his code some time for the revised report :-( ___ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell

Report with lots of hyperlinks

Hi I've rewritten the syntax section (appendix B) in docbook, slightly hacked the nwalsh style sheets and produced http://c93.keble.ox.ac.uk/~ian/report/html/ The lexical Structure section is also just started more as proof-of-concept for linking back into the rest of the report. As we

Re: Haskell 98 Revised

qop -> qvarop | qconop in the context-free syntax - is this deliberate? It really sucks IMO. > My plan is to iterate just once more (early Dec), and then freeze > the report at Christmas. I'm getting tired! :-) Thanks Ian ___ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell

Re: Haskell 98 Revised

member "foo" in class "Fractional" Prelude> As the report stands I don't think any implementation does the right thing, but that they should fail due to not being able to offsideify the module as n == m on the line defining foo so the { is neither explicitly nor

Re: GUI Library Task Force

future then I don't have a problem with that. Incidentally "orignal" is spelt wrong in the first line. Thanks Ian ___ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell

Library report examples

gt; Array (a,b) c -> Array b c row i x = ixmap (l,u) (\j->(i,j)) x where ((_,l),(_,u)) = bounds x ~~~~~~ ~~~ Thanks Ian ___ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell

List module in library report exports []((:), [])

being indented at all (only looked at the HTML version). I think unionBy eq xs ys = xs ++ foldl (flip (deleteBy eq)) (nubBy eq ys) xs may be clearer written as unionBy eq xs ys = xs ++ deleteFirstsBy eq (nubBy eq ys) xs Thanks Ian ___ Haskell maili

Re: Library report examples

worth quibbling over at any rate :-) Another one for you: In 10.3 (Monad, Functions) the listFile example uses openFile where it means readFile. Another minor quibble: the use of brackets around contexts isn't consistent within the Monad section (haven't looked at the others). Thanks

IO library report

(map toUpper s) The section also doesn't follow the convention of the portable part of the module definition being given at the end of the section. Thanks Ian ___ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell

IO errors

,False] (I don't seem to have a hugs Directory.hs) while the library report only allows isIllegalOperation, isPermissionError and isAlreadyExistsError. I haven't looked for other cases of this. (this is under Linux, don't know if it would behave differe

Confused about Random

for Random.Random needed in left hand pattern at 17:11. and hugs doesn't seem to know genRange exists. With it commented out it returns the same as ghc. Thanks Ian ___ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell

Re: --+ not treated as a start of a comment

legal > lexeme (Sec. 2.3, p. 6). Euch. Is --- the start of a comment? Either way the lexical syntax needs to be changed, either to comment -> dashes {any} newline dashes -> -- {-} or to comment -> dashes {any} newline dashes -> -- Thanks Ian _

Re: Clarification of \begin{code} ... \end{code} stuff

On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 04:03:27PM +, Ian Lynagh wrote: > > In the thread "Literate scripts not handled correctly" Simon Marlow > said: > > > Yes, it looks like GHC's unlit program removes whitespace when looking > > for \begin{code}, but not for

Layout rule (again)

micolon to be inserted. This can be fixed by changing L ({n}:ts) (m:ms) = { : (L ts (n:m:ms)) if n > m, (Note 1) = { : } : (L ts (m:ms)) otherwise to L ({n}:ts) (m:ms) = { : (L ts (n:m:ms)) if n > m, (Note 1) = { : } : (L (:ts) (m:ms)) otherwis

Confused about default

I am not sure who is wrong with default ([Foo]) or (Foo -> Int). Finally, the context free grammar doesn't currently enforce the restriction that only one default declaration be given. Fixing it would make rather a mess, though. Ian ___ Haskel

Re: Confused about default

at I was asking: What is a monotype? For example, is "[Foo]" a monotype and is "Foo -> Int" a monotype? The context free grammar implies that a monotype is identical to a type, in which case why is a different name used? The rest was to attempt to high

unsafePerformIO to give warnings

sion that they were in the wrong. Thanks Ian ___ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell

Re: unsafePerformIO to give warnings

or help Main> main foobar Main> main bar Main> main bar Main> main bar and in ghci: Skipping Main ( q.lhs, ./q.o ) Main> main foo bar Main> main bar Main> main bar Main> main bar Main> Thanks again Ian ___ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell

vim syntax highlighting file for TeX and Haskell in the same file

Hi all I have written a vim syntax highlighting file which, given a literate script with TeX markup surrounding the Haskell code, will highlight both the TeX and Haskell. lhaskell.vim is at http://c93.keble.ox.ac.uk/~ian/haskell-vim/lhaskell.vim along with haskell.vim and tex.vim, but

#s causing errors when -cpp not given

hc give me errors: $ rm Foo.{o,hi}; nhc98 -c Foo.lhs -o Foo.o Unknown preprocessor directive at line 4 in file ./Foo.lhs ifdef QQ $ rm Foo.{o,hi}; ghc -c Foo.lhs -o Foo.o Foo.lhs:4: parse error on input `#' Are ghc and nhc98 being incompatible with Haskell 9

Re: #s causing errors when -cpp not given

it is parsing the > output from CPP. Apart from this, '#' should be interpreted exactly as > per the report (when -fglasgow-exts is off). See below - changing "FOO" to "ifdef FOO" has the same result. [ian@urchin /tmp]$ cat Foo.lhs #FOO > main = ret

Non-determinism in newline in the Haskell report

cing the above with the following. It does mean that creates 2 newlines, but I don't believe this should be a problem. whitechar-> newline | vertab | formfeed | space | tab | uniWhite newline -> return | linefeed return -> a carriage return linefeed -> a line fe

Re: syntax difference between Hugs and GHC

On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 02:32:37PM -0500, Dean Herington wrote: > GHC accepts the declaration: > > (a # b) = a ++ b > > but Hugs rejects it, saying: > > Syntax error in input (unexpected `=') > > Who

Re: Non-determinism in newline in the Haskell report

space | tab | uniWhite > | newline -> return | linefeed > | return -> a carriage return > | linefeed -> a line feed > > Why not say > > newline -> return linefeed | return | linefeed > > which, given maximal munch, will behave decen

Re: layout rules for "where"

please, whatever you do or even suggest doing to layout rules, don't break the non-layout way. -- Ian Zimmerman, Oakland, California, U.S.A. GPG: 433BA087 9C0F 194F 203A 63F7 B1B8 6E5A 8CA3 27DB 433B A087 The world has taken on a thickness of vulgarity that raises a spiritual man'

Re: H98 Report: expression syntax glitch

ct it's misparsing these as > > f x = (\x -> (x*x .)) > > g x = (if x then 1 else (2 +)) > > h = (let op x y = y in (3 `op`)) > > But I would claim that nhc98 is parsing these correctly, at least But, for example

Re: H98 Report: expression syntax glitch

ust bitter from spending a while thinking about and implementing this myself!) and makes some previously legal scripts illegal. Thanks Ian ___ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell

Re: FW: Haskell 98 lexical syntax again

cters newline, return, linefeed, and formfeed, all start a new line. in "B.3 Layout" should also be updated. In fact I think it should be changed to * The token newline starts a new line regardless, although that kind of reminds me the "May contain nuts" warning on

Layout indentation marking

entation of the lexeme, provided that it is not, as a consequence of the first two rules, preceded by {n}. (A string literal may span multiple lines -- Section 2.6.) where I have altered only the first line). Thanks Ian ___ Haskell mail

Haskell2LaTeX

nicely typeset. I don't think I can explain any better in this medium, so go take a look :-) Enjoy Ian ___ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell

HC&A Report: "Haskell 98 Report" copyright

fer it if such forking wasn't necessary, but if the above is the case (I am not a lawyer, etc etc) then I guess it isn't the end of the world - I must admit to not seeing what CUP would be getting out of it if this is so, though. Ian ___ Has

Re: MD5 in Haskell

On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 09:39:08AM +, Ganesh Sittampalam wrote: > On Fri, 08 Nov 2002 09:57:08 +0100, Peter Thiemann > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >there used to be a Haskell implementation of MD5 and other cryptographic > >hashes available on > >http:

IO confusion

st I thought it was a GHC bug, but now nhc98 also exhibits it I am wondering if it is a bug in my understanding? Thanks Ian ___ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell

Re: IO confusion

On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 02:51:48PM -, Simon Marlow wrote: > > in fact, any prefix of "Foo", including the empty string, would be > correct. See section 21.2.2 in the (revised) Haskell 98 report. Aha, thanks. I've kludged around it with last ('

Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 6.0.1

-libsrc packages. It should enter testing in 10 days time. Stable packages are available from Isaac's "Haskell Experimental" repository. To use them, add deb http://www.syntaxpolice.org/haskell-experimental/ stable/ to your /etc/apt/sources.list and install as above. Thanks Ian

Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 6.2

able/ and install as above. Unfortunately things aren't quite back to normal after the recent Debian break-in, so sparc and s390 builds haven't been done yet. Also, only x86, sparc and ia64 are registerised builds. I'll try a powerpc registerised build when I can log in to a suitable

Re: [Haskell] vim syntax files for GHC-style .lhs, .hs + cpp

l with -cpp > preprocessor sprinkles. The directories should go in your ~/.vim/ > folder. I've put mine here: http://urchin.cipe/~ian/vim/ They also use a simple heuristic to guess whether the non-Haskell stuff should be treated as TeX or just text, and cope with the Bird style. We re

Re: [Haskell] vim syntax files for GHC-style .lhs, .hs + cpp

On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 04:20:59PM +, Ian Lynagh wrote: > > I've put mine here: http://urchin.cipe/~ian/vim/ Or, more usefully, http://urchin.earth.li/~ian/vim/ Ian ___ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.

Re: [Haskell] hscpp

release (3.1). I'm told this is still possible, so I'll have a look at it unless someone else says they already have or want to. Thanks Ian ___ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell

[Haskell] Unnamed fields

it's a bit odd, I don't think it's a problem. Thanks Ian ___ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell

Re: [Haskell] Unnamed fields

On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 04:07:48PM +, Malcolm Wallace wrote: > On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 15:04:02 +0000, Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Is there a good reason why I can't say > > > > > > data Bar = Bar { _ :: Int, _ :: Char, x :: Bo

[Haskell] ANNOUNCE: Well-Typed LLP - The Haskell Consultants

Fellow Haskellers, We (Björn Bringert, Duncan Coutts and Ian Lynagh) are pleased to announce that we have recently set up a Haskell consultancy company, Well-Typed LLP (http://www.well-typed.com/). Our services include application development, library and tool maintenance, project advice, and

Re: [Haskell] making inits less strict

ibrary_submissions Thanks Ian ___ Haskell mailing list Haskell@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell

Re: [Haskell] A problem with overlapping instances and super-classes

e list it on http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/bugs-and-infelicities.html#haskell98-divergence ? Thanks Ian ___ Haskell mailing list Haskell@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell

[Haskell] ANNOUNCE: trac for projects on community.haskell.org

Hi all, It is now possible for projects on community.haskell.org to create themselves a trac (which provides a bug tracking system and wiki). Please see http://community.haskell.org/admin/using_project.html#trac for details of how to do so. Thanks Ian

[Haskell] ANNOUNCE: GHC version 6.8.3

= The (Interactive) Glasgow Haskell Compiler -- version 6.8.3 = The GHC Team is pleased to announce a new patchlevel release of GHC. This release contains a number of

[Haskell] Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 6.8.3 - Mac OS X, Intel/Leopard

On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:22:39PM +1000, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote: > > An installer package for Mac OS X, Intel/Leopard, is available at > > http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~chak/haskell/GHC-6.8.3-i386.pkg Thanks Manuel; I've added this to the GHC download p

[Haskell] ANNOUNCE: GHC version 6.10.1

== The (Interactive) Glasgow Haskell Compiler -- version 6.10.1 == The GHC Team is pleased to announce a new major release of GHC. There have been a number of signific

[Haskell] ANN: new community.haskell.org features: webspace, mailing lists

at http://community.haskell.org/ Thanks Ian, on behalf of the community admin team ___ Haskell mailing list Haskell@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell

Re: [Haskell] possible bug in pretty-1.0.1.0

The best place at the moment is in GHC's trac: http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/newticket setting the component to "libraries/pretty". Thanks Ian ___ Haskell mailing list Haskell@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell

[Haskell] ANNOUNCE: GHC version 6.10.2

== The (Interactive) Glasgow Haskell Compiler -- version 6.10.2 == The GHC Team is pleased to announce a new patchlevel release of GHC. This release contains a number

[Haskell] ANNOUNCE: GHC version 6.10.3

== The (Interactive) Glasgow Haskell Compiler -- version 6.10.3 == The GHC Team is pleased to announce a new patchlevel release of GHC. This release contains a handful

Re: [Haskell] Re: Top Level

ust Reactive.Yampa etc. > > Where should the modules of Conal’s reactive package be rooted then? Under > Control.Reactive.Reactive? I don't know anything about the package, but if putting the modules directly under Control.Reactive wouldn't make sense the

[Haskell] ANNOUNCE: GHC version 6.10.4

== The (Interactive) Glasgow Haskell Compiler -- version 6.10.4 == The GHC Team is pleased to announce a new patchlevel release of GHC. This release contains a number

[Haskell] ANNOUNCE: GHC version 6.12.1

== The (Interactive) Glasgow Haskell Compiler -- version 6.12.1 == The GHC Team is pleased to announce a new major release of GHC. There have been a number of signific

[Haskell] Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 6.12.1

On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 03:24:05PM +0100, Bas van Dijk wrote: > There's a broken link to the Haskell Platform in: > > http://haskell.org/ghc/docs/6.12.1/html/users_guide/release-6-12-1.html#id2890234 Thanks; fixed with a redirect

[Haskell] {darcs,hackage,cvs}.haskell.org, monk.galois.com

ark it as dealt with. If you see any other problems with the new server, or anything else missing from it, let me know. Thanks Ian ___ Haskell mailing list Haskell@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell

[Haskell] {darcs,hackage,cvs}.haskell.org, monk.galois.com

Hi all, monk is just days away from being turned off, so if you want to get anything off of it before that happens, you need to do it now. More information here: http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell/2010-January/021861.html Thanks Ian

  1   2   >