Thomas Hallgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In the syntax for labeled fields (records) the symbol <- is chosen
> as the operator used to associate a label with a value in
> constructions and patterns:
[...]
> According to a committee member, there were no convincing reasons
> why <- was chosen
I always favoured `=' over `<-', but I don't care much.
-- Lennart
I always favoured `=' over `<-', but I don't care much.
-- Lennart
> Thomas Hallgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > In the syntax for labeled fields (records) the symbol <- is chosen
> > as the operator used to associate a label with a value in
> > constructions and patterns:
> [...]
> > According to a committee member, there were no convincing reasons
> >
First, I am happy to see that Haskell 1.3, with its many valuable
improvements over Haskell 1.2, is finally getting ready,
but I also have a comment:
In the syntax for labeled fields (records) the symbol <- is chosen
as the operator used to associate a label with a value in
constructions and pat
Announcing a preliminary version of the Haskell 1.3 report.
The Haskell 1.3 report is nearly complete. All technical issues
appear to be resolved and the report is nearly ready. The report
will be finalized April 19. Any comments must be submitted by
April 15. We do not anticipate making an
