HTable is not thread-safe , as seen from the handling of internal data
structures, and is ok.
But put / delete seems to have sync. blocks though. any rationale about the
same ? would it be worth removing the 'sync' from on the methods ?
>
> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 9:52 PM, Karthik K wrote:
> > HTable is not thread-safe , as seen from the handling of internal data
> > structures, and is ok.
> >
> > But put / delete seems to have sync. blocks though. any rationale about
> the
> > same ? would it be worth removing the 'sync' from on the methods ?
> >
>
Thanks for taking this far and everyone here for their patience during the
transition (to ivy/ mvn ) .
This will surely make it a bit more easy for independent projects to get
started off HBase and gather momentum.
--
Karthik.
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Stack wrote:
> When hudson, th
This is great news. Congrats HBase team.
(Does this mean, the packages would be refactored as o.a.hbase.* in the
trunk ? ).
--
Karthik.
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Cosmin Lehene wrote:
> This is great news!
>
> On Apr 22, 2010, at 8:32 PM, Stack wrote:
>
> > The board yesterday passed
n make life difficult for our users... thoughts
> > people?
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:17 PM, Karthik K wrote:
> > >
> > > This is great news. Congrats HBase team.
> > >
> > > (Does this mean, the packages would be refactored as
> > > o.a.hbase.* in the trunk ? ).
>
>
>
>
>
>
