+1
Tom
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Stack wrote:
> Please vote as to whether you think HBase should become a top-level
> Apache project.
>
> I've included below a draft board resolution. It lists all current
> active HBase committers as initial members of the project management
> committee
Here are the notes from last Friday's meeting:
http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/DeveloperOffsite20090612. Thanks to
everyone who contributed!
Cheers,
Tom
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Christophe
Bisciglia wrote:
> Hadoop Developers, we'd like to let you know about a special developer
> offsite: h
I just noticed that https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1883
(Adding versioning to Record I/O) has become
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-291, even though it has
nothing to do with HBase (as far as I know). I think this may be
because it mentions HBase in one of the comments. N
FYI
-- Forwarded message --
From: Philip M. Gollucci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, May 2, 2008 at 9:10 AM
Subject: Re: SVN commit restored [READ ONLY AGAIN]
To: Joe Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joe Schaefer wrote:
> I say tentatively because this is the sa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tom White updated HBASE-288:
Attachment: hadoop-blockcache-v7.patch
A new patch (v7) with just the HBase parts in it. I successfully
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12585030#action_12585030
]
Tom White commented on HBASE-487:
-
How about JavaScript? It comes with the JDK from ver
