Re: [HCP-Users] MEG resting state

2017-11-20 Thread Georgios Michalareas
on behalf of A Nunes <adonay.s.nu...@gmail.com <mailto:adonay.s.nu...@gmail.com>> Date: Thursday, 16. November 2017 at 21:56 To: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org <mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>" <HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org <mailto:HCP-Users@

Re: [HCP-Users] MEG resting state

2017-11-19 Thread A Nunes
> Giorgos > > From: <hcp-users-boun...@humanconnectome.org> on behalf of A Nunes < > adonay.s.nu...@gmail.com> > Date: Thursday, 16. November 2017 at 21:56 > To: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org" <HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org> > Subject: [HCP-Users] ME

Re: [HCP-Users] MEG resting state

2017-11-17 Thread Michalareas, Georgios
nu...@gmail.com<mailto:adonay.s.nu...@gmail.com>> Date: Thursday, 16. November 2017 at 21:56 To: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>" <HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org>> Subject: [HCP-Users] MEG resting stat

[HCP-Users] MEG resting-state data: reasons for exclusion

2016-03-30 Thread Giles Colclough
Can anyone point me to why certain subjects have not provided some resting-state data? For example, in the MEG2 release, 6 subjects don’t provide rMEG. I’ve hunted, but can’t find out why. Thanks for any suggestions. Giles ___ HCP-Users mailing list