:19 PM
> *To: *"Harms, Michael" <mha...@wustl.edu>
> *Cc: *"Glasser, Matthew" <glass...@wustl.edu>, David Hofmann <
> davidhofma...@gmail.com>, hcp-users <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
>
> *Subject: *Re: [HCP-Users] Concatenating resting
l.edu>
Cc: "Glasser, Matthew" <glass...@wustl.edu>, David Hofmann
<davidhofma...@gmail.com>, hcp-users <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Concatenating resting state runs
When we compute parcellated connectivity, we first compute the average
ustl.edu
>
>
>
> *From: *"Glasser, Matthew" <glass...@wustl.edu>
> *Date: *Wednesday, March 7, 2018 at 3:39 PM
> *To: *David Hofmann <davidhofma...@gmail.com>
>
> *Cc: *"Harms, Michael" <mha...@wustl.edu>, hcp-users <
> hcp-users@huma
mann <davidhofma...@gmail.com>
Cc: "Harms, Michael" <mha...@wustl.edu>, hcp-users
<hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Concatenating resting state runs
The basic idea for variance normalization is to equalize the variance of the
noise. It is very hel
PM
To: Matt Glasser <glass...@wustl.edu<mailto:glass...@wustl.edu>>
Cc: "Harms, Michael" <mha...@wustl.edu<mailto:mha...@wustl.edu>>, hcp-users
<hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Conca
sser <glass...@wustl.edu>, David Hofmann <
> davidhofma...@gmail.com>
> Cc: hcp-users <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
> Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Concatenating resting state runs
>
>
>
> Hi Matt,
>
> Right, that recipe is straightforward, but for completeness th
er <glass...@wustl.edu<mailto:glass...@wustl.edu>>, David Hofmann
<davidhofma...@gmail.com<mailto:davidhofma...@gmail.com>>
Cc: hcp-users
<hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Concatenating resting s
...@wustl.edu>
Date: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 at 11:24 AM
To: "Harms, Michael" <mha...@wustl.edu>, David Hofmann <davidhofma...@gmail.com>
Cc: hcp-users <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Concatenating resting state runs
Hi Mike,
Not
lt;hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Concatenating resting state runs
Also, if David were to do this with HCP-YA data, does he additionally need to
worry about “backing out” the bias field normalization?
--
Michael Harms, Ph.D.
---
rg<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Concatenating resting state runs
Matt,
Don’t we compute an estimate of the unstructured noise variance as part of
RestingStateState, and then place that into one of the packages?
--
Michael Harms, Ph.D.
---
y, March 7, 2018 at 11:21 AM
To: "Glasser, Matthew" <glass...@wustl.edu>, David Hofmann
<davidhofma...@gmail.com>
Cc: hcp-users <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Concatenating resting state runs
Matt,
Don’t we compute an estimate of the unstruc
du>
Date: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 at 11:01 AM
To: David Hofmann <davidhofma...@gmail.com>
Cc: hcp-users <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Concatenating resting state runs
Yes they should be in that same package:
${StudyFolder}/${Subject}/MNINonLinear/Results/${fMR
that might be related to order
>> (e.g. drowsiness being higher in later scans, then order might matter).
>>
>> Peace,
>>
>> Matt.
>>
>> From: David Hofmann <davidhofma...@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 at 10:02 AM
>>
>> To:
gt;>
Date: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 at 10:47 AM
To: Matt Glasser <glass...@wustl.edu<mailto:glass...@wustl.edu>>
Cc: hcp-users
<hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Concatenating resting state runs
Ah I underst
at 10:02 AM
>
> To: Matt Glasser <glass...@wustl.edu>
> Cc: hcp-users <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
> Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Concatenating resting state runs
>
> Hey Matthew,
>
> not sure I understood where to get the unstructured noise variance from,
>
p-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Concatenating resting state runs
Hey Matthew,
not sure I understood where to get the unstructured noise variance from, i.e.
is it even possible to apply this to the FIX extended datasets?
I thought
...@wustl.edu>>
Cc: hcp-users
<hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Concatenating resting state runs
Hi Matthew,
ok, so temporal filtering separately for each run. Any comments on
concatenation and z-standardization?
Hi Matthew,
ok, so temporal filtering separately for each run. Any comments on
concatenation and z-standardization?
I think there might be a work-around to supplying a custom ROI timecourse
to the DCM VOI-files somehow, but which values to input as alternative to
the eigenvariate? The mean over
You would want to apply temporal filtering separately to each run. I wonder if
there is a way you could just provide the ROI timecourses to SPM’s DCM model
without using its tools for extracting the ROIs so that you could avoid the
issues spatial localization that SPM has. If you used areal
19 matches
Mail list logo
