Re: [HCP-Users] GenericfMRIVolumeProcessingPipelineBatch motion correction

2014-10-28 Thread Book, Gregory
Hi Greg, I ran some more subjects and I checked the resulting image for one of them. This subject had 0.6mm total displacement over the 900 volumes, no spikes, all smooth constant displacement through the timeseries. I used mcflirt to do that registration. In this image

Re: [HCP-Users] GenericfMRIVolumeProcessingPipelineBatch motion correction

2014-10-28 Thread Glasser, Matthew
What is the resolution of this fMRI data? I seem to recall someone else had trouble with the motion correction pipeline on lower resolution data. It may be that we need to allow an option for mcflirt in the pipelines if the default method doesn¹t work for someone. Peace, Matt. On 10/28/14,

Re: [HCP-Users] Using Connectome Workbench Commands

2014-10-28 Thread Nomi, Jason
Hi Tim, Thank you for the help with the workbench and the code. Yes, it is a mac osx. Sorry for the mix up. Also, I can get the first two commands to work for MEAN and STDEV, but the last command gives me an error message: wb_command -volume-math '((x - mean) / stdev)' normalized.nii.gz

Re: [HCP-Users] GenericfMRIVolumeProcessingPipelineBatch motion correction

2014-10-28 Thread Book, Gregory
Hi Michael, The animated gif has the raw timeseries (SubjID/unprocessed/3T/resting/analysis_3T_resting.nii.gz) on top and the end result of the HCP processing on the bottom (SubjID/MNINonLinear/Results/resting/resting.nii.gz). Some of the big motions are from volumes 450-600. The voxel size of

Re: [HCP-Users] Using Connectome Workbench Commands

2014-10-28 Thread Timothy Coalson
That is the error I would expect if you removed the -repeat after the -var option for mean (yes, it needs 2 -repeat options, they each associate with one -var option) - could you paste the command you actually ran? Tim On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Nomi, Jason jxn...@miami.edu wrote: Hi