We used ipat=2 MB=5 for 1.6mm isotropic data with TR=1s (for reasons of improving temporal cleanup, I might be inclined to do 2mm and shorten the TR further like the 3T HCP data, but there are still active investigations into whether the 1.6mm data allow
us to see finer details). The main
fsl doesn't support CIFTI files yet. What you want for those is wb_command
-cifti-merge:
http://www.humanconnectome.org/software/workbench-command.php?function=-cifti-merge
Tim
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Farrant, Kristafor kxf...@miami.edu
wrote:
Thanks!
I should be able to use
Matt,
Please keep in mind Marta is using a 24ch coil, instead of a 32ch coil at 7T. I
would recommend keeping 1.6 mm and evaluate IPAT2+MB3 or IPAT2+MB4 with the
24ch coil.
Gordon
On Mar 24, 2015, at 11:07 AM, Glasser, Matthew
glass...@wusm.wustl.edumailto:glass...@wusm.wustl.edu wrote:
I
I would get at least 30 min of resting state if not more so that your estimates are more stable. The faster your TR, the better you will be able to clean your data and the more robust multivariate statistics like ICA will be.
I would recommend the spin echo field map approach (i.e. using
Good point, in that case, you’ll want to push the MB factor only as far as it still makes good images.
Peace,
Matt.
From: Xu, Junqian junqian...@mssm.edu
Date: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 at 10:29 AM
To: Matt Glasser glass...@wusm.wustl.edu
Cc: Marta Moreno mmorenoort...@icloud.com, HCP
Dear users,
I have recently read that you should never temporally concatenate without first
demeaning the individual timeseries, posted by Stephen Smith?
(http://www.mail-archive.com/hcp-users@humanconnectome.org/msg00444.html). I
want to know if I should either A) demean the individual time
