Re: [HCP-Users] Clarification regarding DWI datasets

2017-07-26 Thread Timothy Coalson
As some additional explanation, the reason there are multiple files in the unprocessed data is that we did not acquire all the directions in a single scan (that would have been excessively long). Instead, they are split across several scans, which are separate files before preprocessing. The

Re: [HCP-Users] Clarification regarding DWI datasets

2017-07-26 Thread Glasser, Matthew
1. Yes 2. Yes 3. Use the preprocessed data which has all files preprocessed and combined appropriately in ${StudyFolder}/${Subject}/T1w/Diffusion. If you are using your own diffusion model, be sure to take into account the gradient nonlinearity effects on the diffusion weighting and

Re: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a

2017-07-26 Thread Glasser, Matthew
Hi Yeun, You would not want to use MIGP for this and this isn’t for running melodic directly on CIFTI files. If you are acquiring no more than a total of 1652 frames of fMRI per subject, you shouldn’t have any issues with that version that I can think of. Tim Brown might have further

Re: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a

2017-07-26 Thread Yeun Kim
Hi Matt, Great, thanks. I was able to use the multi-run ICA+FIX with MELODIC from FSL 5.0.9-3~nd14.04+1. Is it correct to use MELODIC from this FSL release (5.0.9-3~nd14.04+1) for HCP multi-run ICA+FIX? We would like to lock down the software versions for our pipelines very soon. According to

[HCP-Users] Clarification regarding DWI datasets

2017-07-26 Thread Shruti Narasimham
Dear all, I am new to the HCP datasets and therefore a bit confused about the DWI datasets uploaded. I would be very grateful if you could kindly clarify the following: 1. 3T DWI data has scans with b-values 0,1000,2000,3000 while 7T has with 0,1000,2000 ? 2. Each subject has