FYI: We are switching over to using ‘dcm2niix’, which is Chris Rorden’s newer,
actively maintained conversion tool.
--
Michael Harms, Ph.D.
---
Conte Center for the Neuroscience of Mental Disorders
Washington University School of Medicine
1. Yes
2. We use dcm2nii.
3. Probably
I would use offline so you are sure that all of your images are being corrected
the same way and have control over how the resampling is being done (i.e. not
adding blurring from trilinear interpolation).
Peace,
Matt.
From:
That means they didn¹t complete all of the scans. It is up to you whether
you want to include such subjects in your study.
Peace,
Matt.
On 8/3/17, 10:00 PM, "hcp-users-boun...@humanconnectome.org on behalf of
Fang-Cheng Yeh"
Hi HCP Consortium,
The dMRI protocol has 270 directions (excluding b0), but there
are several subjects with dMRI data less than 270 directions (shown by
the bval file). For example, subject 578158 only has 164 DWI (b0
excluded). Is this a known quality control issue?
Best regards,
Frank
I meant the volume to surface mapping, so it sounds like your plan should work
fine.
Peace,
Matt.
From: Claude Bajada >
Date: Friday, August 4, 2017 at 5:17 AM
To: Matt Glasser >, Timothy
Thanks for the reply Matt.
I didn't quite understand what you mean by: " I would do your mapping in
individual subjects."
In case it was not clear, the tractography is of course performed in
individual subject space using the MSMAll surfaces in the subject
directory of the T1w folders. My