Also, I wouldn’t recommend doing that. There is plenty of BOLD signal outside
those frequencies.
Peace,
Matt.
From:
>
on behalf of Timothy Coalson >
Date: Thursday,
We do not apply that kind of narrow temporal filtering (we basically only
do a detrend), you will need to do such things yourself.
Tim
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 9:27 PM, hercp wrote:
> I am looking at rfMRI data. Are there files that are already
> time-filtered between .01 and .08
I am looking at rfMRI data. Are there files that are already time-filtered
between .01 and .08 or should I do the filtering myself? If there are, where
are they, and how are they labeled?
Thanks once again,
Heracles Panagiotides, PhD
___
Thank you Matt and Tim for the very useful comments!
Xavier.
From: Glasser, Matthew [glass...@wustl.edu]
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2017 5:25 PM
To: NEUROSCIENCE tim; Xavier Guell Paradis
Cc: hcp-users@humanconnectome.org
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Table
Right. Basically we are suspicious of defining areas based on statistical
thresholds, as these are unlikely to reflect biological boundaries in the
brain, but rather the vagaries of the statistical thresholding approach and the
noise distribution.
Peace,
Matt.
From:
The commands in wb_command are designed for scripting flexibility, they
each do a small, low-level operation, to be chained together to achieve
various tasks. However, they mainly output data files, there isn't much
for text output currently.
You could use -cifti-parcellate to parcellate your
Dear HCP experts,
I have a thresholded functional connectivity map (dscalar), and the dlabel
files from the Glasser 2016 multimodal cortical parcellation. I was wondering
whether there is a wb_command that would automatically generate a table
indicating which labels overlap with my functional