Re: [HCP-Users] netmats prediction of fluid intelligence

Germane to this discussion is that using the same methodology, but a different sample of subjects, the same Yale group has recently reported that the correlation of predicted gF (from netmats) and observed gF was r=0.22. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28968754 cheers, -MH -- Michael

[HCP-Users] 3 faculty positions at UCSB, Brain Initiative

Dear HCP-users, Following positions maybe of interest to users on this list Best, Sang == Sang-Yun Oh Assistant Professor Statistics and Applied Probability University of California, Santa Barbara http://www.pstat.ucsb.edu/faculty/syoh/ We're hiring! > *3 junior

Re: [HCP-Users] dtifit, bedpostx, voxel-wise correction of dMRI gradients

Or alternatively you could use the “—kurt” or “—kurtdir" flags which will add a “mean kurtosis” or “parallel/perpendicular kurtosis” parameters that can account for non-exponential decay. Cheers Saad On 10 Oct 2017, at 03:53, Harms, Michael > wrote: