Re: [HCP-Users] questions about using HCP surface ROIs in prob-tracking

On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 11:18 PM, Xinyang Liu wrote: > Dear Tim, > > Hi. Lots of thanks to your very detailed answer! :) > > Yes, I agree with you that it would be better to do tractography in the > subject native volume space. And it is good to know that the MMP1.0 can be

Re: [HCP-Users] questions about using HCP surface ROIs in prob-tracking

Dear Tim, Hi. Lots of thanks to your very detailed answer! :) Yes, I agree with you that it would be better to do tractography in the subject native volume space. And it is good to know that the MMP1.0 can be also used in "T1w"-space surfaces. However, there is one existed problem that I

Re: [HCP-Users] Issues with WB 1.2.3 on Debian 9.1 (Stretch)

Ignore this, got it to work with the neurodebian verison. From: on behalf of ROBERT CARY WELSH Date: Thursday, April 5, 2018 at 1:16 PM To: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org" Subject: [HCP-Users]

[HCP-Users] Issues with WB 1.2.3 on Debian 9.1 (Stretch)

Hi Folks, Anybody have this issue with trying to run WB 1.2.3 on Debian 9.1, and more importantly any fixes? -Robert rcwelsh@hyperion:exe_linux64 $which wb_command /erato/mnemosyne/Software/HCP/workbenchv1.2.3/bin_linux64//wb_command rcwelsh@hyperion:exe_linux64 $wb_command --help